Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965330AbWIRDjG (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:39:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751379AbWIRDjG (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:39:06 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42927 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751327AbWIRDjD (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:39:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 05:30:27 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Nicholas Miell , Paul Mundt , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Jes Sorensen , Andrew Morton , Roman Zippel , Tom Zanussi , Richard J Moore , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Michel Dagenais , Mathieu Desnoyers , Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , William Cohen , "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: tracepoint maintainance models Message-ID: <20060918033027.GB11894@elte.hu> References: <450D182B.9060300@opersys.com> <20060917112128.GA3170@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <20060917143623.GB15534@elte.hu> <1158524390.2471.49.camel@entropy> <20060917230623.GD8791@elte.hu> <450DEEA5.7080808@opersys.com> <20060918005624.GA30835@elte.hu> <450DFFC8.5080005@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <450DFFC8.5080005@opersys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.9 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.9 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4999] -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 896 Lines: 23 * Karim Yaghmour wrote: > > [...] if i removed a few dozen static markups with dynamic scripts > > (which change too would be transparent to users of dynamic tracers), > > that in this case users of static tracers would /not/ claim that > > tracing broke? > 2- removed markups are not transparent to "static" tracers: > > False. LTTng couldn't care less. [...] Amazing! So the trace data provided by those removed static markups (which were moved into dynamic scripts and are thus still fully available to dynamic tracers) are still available to LTT users? How is that possible, via quantum tunneling perhaps? ;-) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/