Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751553AbWIRESW (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:18:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751555AbWIRESW (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:18:22 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:13034 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751549AbWIRESV (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:18:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:09:55 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Paul Mundt , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Jes Sorensen , Andrew Morton , Roman Zippel , Tom Zanussi , Richard J Moore , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Michel Dagenais , Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , William Cohen , "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: tracepoint maintainance models Message-ID: <20060918040955.GC11894@elte.hu> References: <450D182B.9060300@opersys.com> <20060917112128.GA3170@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <20060917143623.GB15534@elte.hu> <20060917153633.GA29987@Krystal> <20060918000703.GA22752@elte.hu> <450DF28E.3050101@opersys.com> <20060918011352.GB30835@elte.hu> <450E053B.1070908@opersys.com> <20060918025722.GA11894@elte.hu> <450E1860.8010301@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <450E1860.8010301@opersys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.9 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.9 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1324 Lines: 31 * Karim Yaghmour wrote: > By no stretch of the english language did I insult you. [...] let me point it out then: >> That has been your own personal experience of such things. >> Fortunately by now you've provided to casual readers ample proof that >> such experience is but limited and therefore misleading. you wrote this disputing a point of mine that Mathieu acknowledged meanwhile, and which you now acknowledge in this mail too: > So, yes Ingo, you "wont be able to extract 'x' from the MARK(event, a) > markup" using just a "static" tracer. [...] and as i wrote to Mathieu, this differene in markup can have performance impact on the code generated by gcc, so it can be of practical relevance. Unfortunately i dont have much influence on the fact that it takes so much time for you to understand and acknowledge such simple points: in this highly trivial case it was 3(!) mail exchanges =B-) Yuck! I should really heed others' advice that i should simply stop replying to you ... but i have to admit that often it's so tempting. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/