Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:45:40 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        vireshk@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, amitk@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
        cw00.choi@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com,
        kyungmin.park@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max
 power
Message-ID: <20210127091540.xesvwoeavyaf37jn@vireshk-i7>
References: <20210126104001.20361-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210126104001.20361-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 26-01-21, 10:39, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> As it's a RFC, it still misses the cpufreq sysfs implementation, but would
> be addressed if all agree.

Not commenting on the whole stuff but if you ever need something for cpufreq, it
is already there. Look for these.

store_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
store_one(scaling_max_freq, max);

Hopefully they will work just fine.

-- 
viresh