Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:31:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Anant Thazhemadam <anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com>
Cc:     Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@huawei.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
        "Zqiang linux-usb @ vger . kernel . org" <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] [PATCH v3 12/12] usb: misc: usbtest: update to
 use the, usb_control_msg_{send|recv}() API
Message-ID: <YBFPHk8s+vV7BD3M@kroah.com>
References: <20210126183403.911653-1-anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com>
 <20210126184043.915235-1-anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com>
 <640bd2a0-89c2-b01b-4827-5d2f05b2fb90@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <640bd2a0-89c2-b01b-4827-5d2f05b2fb90@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:17:06AM +0530, Anant Thazhemadam wrote:
> Looks like the subject line got messed up for patch 12/12.
> I'm sorry about that. Do I have to resend the patch?

I can't apply it as-is, so yes, it will have to be resent.

thanks,

greg k-h