Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 17:17:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 17:16:58 -0500 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.17]:5334 "EHLO mailout02.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 17:16:54 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Tim Jansen To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit. Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:19:51 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: Jonathan Lundell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <160qaQ-2523rUC@fmrl04.sul.t-online.com> <20011105150441.D4735@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20011105150441.D4735@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <160s2v-19Yq7UC@fmrl04.sul.t-online.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 06 November 2001 00:04, Greg KH wrote: > The contents of /proc/bus/usb is the usbdevfs file system. It does not > fit into the current /proc model, or discussion. It's just a example of a complex data structure that cannot easily be represented using the tagged-list form (I took it as an example because the first version of the devreg patch used tagged lists, too, and the complexity of representing this USB structure convinced me that tagged-lists are too limited). Whatever format is chosen for proc, it should be used for all data. bye... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/