Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp707872pxb; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:09:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFl2tpNn6ya8z3iiRJa4Dy26dXIz1Fv+pa8yrl9UXVTXoM4w6b/QPgW3tdz4pBElJ6pyVr X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e84:: with SMTP id p4mr9609352ejf.141.1611806951468; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:09:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611806951; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ykMLALPcUhnnR/Fywg3BZY3mS7QHLEAirdPe+vLC703CYP8J5bchZrDYxR4X8i9ZZG ChK48CuUAUfBYmvlc+y14YEaOmGqfoMeB7W7SJVbCJJlujhgABe9go2DpUzeZwZcKjWz LPDOpwSLxYIOinTrYiiYePkHRbyAQLNxKDmIBF6r47WCyPFChlWyblPSVWA0pYox2hqK rHKwA2ZVuz9gbS0gXmYQOIi22oDKlNZ0dyKPRUl7fDMBFhsFb4LuON51RLOgHhirRFAV nKHgRyXuLUfpUN8TYrazvMHQKR+eX0lmG+vaEUVkOewZgnalKay22+eTX19rvYnIbiEJ ffjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=dzl2P44Yb+cNWgQrSsQPdvhI/zPDp51SLN+n5BsmTYw=; b=Xcz7hpfCs907q8ArDT2pFYiY/WqcIGBmixbFsBUVEdo1qXJf9RTL1XYVXDY+HXap6G UScpvaUdAOCgsinfTJEKR5ceE5CoRl+L6lgn96W11nrdFPP1j+QjVlOSiF42GZ+45nrL YBPXV+uoD9fVFAgL8kByYDndDPlY2m3UIAkF74zFy3l1aQ4rN4Uz+K3dT7N04XgHvzgu raIhl5Nsh2MlA+dANIqfo6liPQPHqKcw5Kgr9a1BrfkBNBSTTOueSDdS8HWhP4JH8ReD 6RTfAoMDu3HCgzgYg9pK74tBJ6UcW0o6BQkzuhFrXO730YpnWzb0dcWNYHSp/kB90F/r 4W0g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=EdovfA0I; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l17si1831315ejf.260.2021.01.27.20.08.47; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:09:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=EdovfA0I; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231365AbhA1EHa (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 23:07:30 -0500 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:40888 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231328AbhA1EGE (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 23:06:04 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.104] (c-73-42-176-67.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.42.176.67]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B19F20B7192; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:05:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 7B19F20B7192 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1611806723; bh=dzl2P44Yb+cNWgQrSsQPdvhI/zPDp51SLN+n5BsmTYw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EdovfA0Ie2vSW3q9X330ya4blxqJxmCNR8pb6jyTPfsAtUyZmv/J5Ert8cRTPsnjJ xhJBn/olUclZEvwaYdy3filR9a9BL3xmmmuC47b6RgwFGBYY+1lryf2SdYcSU6o5Tf +7NNRQWMwng/+UYSQ6g3DbAmnqbMMK2XACp6PUgo= Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 10/10] arm64: Add IMA log information in kimage used for kexec To: Will Deacon , Mimi Zohar Cc: bauerman@linux.ibm.com, robh@kernel.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, james.morse@arm.com, sashal@kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, allison@lohutok.net, masahiroy@kernel.org, bhsharma@redhat.com, mbrugger@suse.com, hsinyi@chromium.org, tao.li@vivo.com, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, prsriva@linux.microsoft.com, balajib@linux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <20210115173017.30617-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> <20210115173017.30617-11-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> <20210127165424.GB358@willie-the-truck> <20210127180230.GA593@willie-the-truck> <8a573f84-732a-3591-8751-f7b08edaa01d@linux.microsoft.com> <6343ab2eec390ab7582beea04f8006af095850c8.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20210127231334.GB1016@willie-the-truck> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Message-ID: <681a4410-8a96-bce1-fcd4-d45d56625b39@linux.microsoft.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:05:21 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210127231334.GB1016@willie-the-truck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/27/21 3:13 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 01:31:02PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: >> On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 10:24 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: >>> On 1/27/21 10:02 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 09:56:53AM -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: >>>>> On 1/27/21 8:54 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:30:17AM -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: >>>>>>> Address and size of the buffer containing the IMA measurement log need >>>>>>> to be passed from the current kernel to the next kernel on kexec. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Add address and size fields to "struct kimage_arch" for ARM64 platform >>>>>>> to hold the address and size of the IMA measurement log buffer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Update CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE to select CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC, if CONFIG_IMA >>>>>>> is enabled, to indicate that the IMA measurement log information is >>>>>>> present in the device tree for ARM64. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Prakhar Srivastava >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + >>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h | 5 +++++ >>>>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >>>>>>> index 1d466addb078..ea7f7fe3dccd 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >>>>>>> @@ -1094,6 +1094,7 @@ config KEXEC >>>>>>> config KEXEC_FILE >>>>>>> bool "kexec file based system call" >>>>>>> select KEXEC_CORE >>>>>>> + select HAVE_IMA_KEXEC if IMA >>>>>>> help >>>>>>> This is new version of kexec system call. This system call is >>>>>>> file based and takes file descriptors as system call argument >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h >>>>>>> index d24b527e8c00..2bd19ccb6c43 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h >>>>>>> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ struct kimage_arch { >>>>>>> void *elf_headers; >>>>>>> unsigned long elf_headers_mem; >>>>>>> unsigned long elf_headers_sz; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC >>>>>>> + phys_addr_t ima_buffer_addr; >>>>>>> + size_t ima_buffer_size; >>>>>>> +#endif >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do these need to be in the arch structure instead of 'struct kimage'? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Currently, only powerpc and, with this patch set, arm64 have support for >>>>> carrying forward IMA measurement list across kexec system call. The above >>>>> fields are used for tracking IMA measurement list. >>>>> >>>>> Do you see a reason to move these fields to "struct kimage"? >>>> >>>> If they're gated on CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC, then it seems harmless for them to >>>> be added to the shared structure. Or are you saying that there are >>>> architectures which have CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC but do not want these fields? >>>> >>> >>> As far as I know, there are no other architectures that define >>> CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC, but do not use these fields. >> >> Yes, CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC enables "carrying the IMA measurement list across >> a soft boot". The only arch that currently carries the IMA >> measurement across kexec is powerpc. > > Ok, in which case this sounds like it should be in the shared structure, no? > Ok - I'll move the IMA kexec buffer fields from "struct kimage_arch" to "struct kimage" for both powerpc and arm64. thanks, -lakshmi