Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] KVM: SVM: Skip SEV cache flush if no ASIDs have
 been used
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
References: <20210114003708.3798992-1-seanjc@google.com>
 <20210114003708.3798992-15-seanjc@google.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <55a63dfb-94a4-6ba2-31d1-c9b6830ff791@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:10:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210114003708.3798992-15-seanjc@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 14/01/21 01:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Skip SEV's expensive WBINVD and DF_FLUSH if there are no SEV ASIDs
> waiting to be reclaimed, e.g. if SEV was never used.  This "fixes" an
> issue where the DF_FLUSH fails during hardware teardown if the original
> SEV_INIT failed.  Ideally, SEV wouldn't be marked as enabled in KVM if
> SEV_INIT fails, but that's a problem for another day.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 23a4bead4a82..e71bc742d8da 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -56,9 +56,14 @@ struct enc_region {
>   	unsigned long size;
>   };
>   
> -static int sev_flush_asids(void)
> +static int sev_flush_asids(int min_asid, int max_asid)
>   {
> -	int ret, error = 0;
> +	int ret, pos, error = 0;
> +
> +	/* Check if there are any ASIDs to reclaim before performing a flush */
> +	pos = find_next_bit(sev_reclaim_asid_bitmap, max_sev_asid, min_asid);
> +	if (pos >= max_asid)
> +		return -EBUSY;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * DEACTIVATE will clear the WBINVD indicator causing DF_FLUSH to fail,
> @@ -80,14 +85,7 @@ static int sev_flush_asids(void)
>   /* Must be called with the sev_bitmap_lock held */
>   static bool __sev_recycle_asids(int min_asid, int max_asid)
>   {
> -	int pos;
> -
> -	/* Check if there are any ASIDs to reclaim before performing a flush */
> -	pos = find_next_bit(sev_reclaim_asid_bitmap, max_sev_asid, min_asid);
> -	if (pos >= max_asid)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (sev_flush_asids())
> +	if (sev_flush_asids(min_asid, max_asid))
>   		return false;
>   
>   	/* The flush process will flush all reclaimable SEV and SEV-ES ASIDs */
> @@ -1323,10 +1321,10 @@ void sev_hardware_teardown(void)
>   	if (!sev_enabled)
>   		return;
>   
> +	sev_flush_asids(0, max_sev_asid);
> +
>   	bitmap_free(sev_asid_bitmap);
>   	bitmap_free(sev_reclaim_asid_bitmap);
> -
> -	sev_flush_asids();
>   }
>   
>   int sev_cpu_init(struct svm_cpu_data *sd)
> 

I can't find 00/14 in my inbox, so: queued 1-3 and 6-14, thanks.

Paolo