Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1065562pxb; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:16:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZuKhsms0UNBQDOuPrOnsN13bP6gXm0L7A4LkoB/Edmivq8gBef+Qqs865wo++FqlqskCx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b2d6:: with SMTP id cf22mr11537441ejb.181.1611847011043; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:16:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611847011; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i2+pNcCWsJRfFh0pZsgJtt0jmTly4Uv04NOCs0B1GaXm5ObRl9UeUY26ZhiACacOwQ cEnGEoiHuNfkpB8n7MdXVH34uUMekJORHtnP80VPluVBnNsTHK4iI+4hCPEOoy379uZQ mzN5TQqSLgreBoVr+12uykf8VL3c/6KhW5iyn0QnYD6YJs+2cIPocb0Zps+p0bct/93Y 9yul/M3naNu41QnJMGlxCr3PGgiinVLuG4DagPD6U4f/Jk241nbhF7OeUf3JZyfwM0AT FCtWz8OaA+yWtSjpekO9PkVCp36NyoP7UPwNuZraORg0XJC8vzA0HvEI72B+/O8RQLbZ UyLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=Hhj0Ci4ubmUQAoG6OK5IyEkrRViQ/scCNDoyVb3q4mQ=; b=HnP7ODz1LvLRfjHleBtPlQqTOaRTleyVWj/uLEjvgtT1b43DXVNSFjLfSwpGOf3EnO FjDCQnzBcItBJMnEA0rlu8yN82ai6O6rJQL/cpsPiSJ9hG8D0N6DGUMrdY31hGV2v5Q1 zi9b+Nyav/9A6Tg0IFT0SiKBSmY5MgnH2+1RMwJX3thQT7vm17a2wS1pKXcnslK99qOR TJLEqtNNDVYFWPRPC55oY+TzZYC5KS/U9QMkfrR+JtsfMVfSJLpu1qk9pVa30nVPjzDC SS9cK9Eno+y59k7bBDTBAyC+pruMoukKDAiDhm1ibvX27xhHLXNlPpLA5sIcs1ohsN3U Md9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NR3dnObx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v26si2650238ejx.316.2021.01.28.07.16.26; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:16:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NR3dnObx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229504AbhA1PMg (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:12:36 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:42440 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232519AbhA1PL2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:11:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611846602; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Hhj0Ci4ubmUQAoG6OK5IyEkrRViQ/scCNDoyVb3q4mQ=; b=NR3dnObxx8Eihp52ZBg7xx6uODXZTAQrz8M00b1FoBBTgoAm7TVGTS1c6wpaB7k4HXfG+W gYx44Sh5QdE/IW5yqbWCNQCNXaBQPTIUP+Ux6uSZhinQpk14oWB9iI4GesP/kkCsO5fj5H 5Me+JHF0rGuPjYfSTx/Y+RW1WqsvXEo= Received: from mail-ej1-f70.google.com (mail-ej1-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-488-oa0avZq6P3mQAd-x0GRXOQ-1; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:10:00 -0500 X-MC-Unique: oa0avZq6P3mQAd-x0GRXOQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f70.google.com with SMTP id h4so2325224eja.12 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:09:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hhj0Ci4ubmUQAoG6OK5IyEkrRViQ/scCNDoyVb3q4mQ=; b=WZ1InYmWbDbm3glExx1ZRSgxedoLtEUEE9kQnyZJJWSQnyvXpET4NBkdZFmBJ5Sa3O tHsQC+sFChby+266fXDI0aXqWE1Wub+Llnr+j3V5aPlxguydQOAtNsrFGWzAqBoEvajv PgoUGDMV1+w2p7x7X2qLsSexkT/blzB/4iKZLOhOLNOjFDQtJZpSNvNpZ2R5Ssax80mv WPzk7qW8nn+8zjsB2nNVkQZoz4t0qOpwP0VujXctkyjxEe/adxc4GJHPcUOAs67BLALu hgmEA7Ry1vxCTBm3wCK4bIncCNgnsupe976if+e2JOG5KYRqt6pKbOw7wZlu/sDRK5Wu YAkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+JrcDjszKm0RmNUeevT93SGM10D5sDfa1T815vqkd4g02HHEs cdfcZAxXSjdjHZreFrNRWeild/24D9XAIA+LlSxf+InZuPUlkkSycP9QWez1ZqNRPcR4D3JOLKd NRm7YFtI5qQ5ZQuONeZLu+87/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3487:: with SMTP id v7mr14873140edc.68.1611846597817; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:09:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3487:: with SMTP id v7mr14873116edc.68.1611846597610; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:09:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s22sm2381402ejd.106.2021.01.28.07.09.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:09:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] x86/cpufeatures: Assign dedicated feature word for AMD mem encryption To: Borislav Petkov , Sean Christopherson Cc: Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tom Lendacky , Brijesh Singh References: <20210114003708.3798992-1-seanjc@google.com> <20210114003708.3798992-5-seanjc@google.com> <20210114113528.GC13213@zn.tnic> <20210114171631.GD13213@zn.tnic> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:09:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210114171631.GD13213@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/01/21 18:16, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:09:28AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> Hmm, patch 05/14 depends on the existence of the new word. That's a non-issue >> if you're planning on taking this for 5.11. If it's destined for 5.12, maybe >> get an ack from Paolo on patch 05 and take both through tip? > > Yeah, I guess that. Both are not urgent 5.11 material to take 'em now. > So I guess I'll wait for Paolo's ACK. If you think this patch is valuable go ahead and pick it. I can wait until after the merge window to queue patch 5. It is independent from the others and I had questions, so I am just queuing the others for 5.12. Paolo >> I can drop them from this series when I send v3. In hindsight, I >> should have split these two patches into a separate mini-series from >> the get-go. > > Nah, no worries. We do patch acrobatics on a daily basis. :-)