Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <fb6c895d98596d802c825961ca8c5ee0a91f8d29.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx/mokx
 entries
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Cc:     dwmw2@infradead.org, jarkko@kernel.org,
        James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, masahiroy@kernel.org,
        michal.lkml@markovi.net, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
        ardb@kernel.org, lszubowi@redhat.com, javierm@redhat.com,
        keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:29:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1ff03fa10f78884b399e2c20ca4e376b575d5b0f.camel@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20210122181054.32635-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
         <3568165.1611846997@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
         <1ff03fa10f78884b399e2c20ca4e376b575d5b0f.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 10:27 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 15:16 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Which tree do you envision this going through?  EFI or keyrings - or are you
> > going to ask Linus to pull it directly?  I can pull it if it should go through
> > the keyrings tree.
> 
> There's one more patch, yet to be posted, which updates
> asymmetric_verify().  As long as you're willing to upstream all of the
> patches, that's fine with me.

Oops, wrong thread.  I thought this was Stefan's patch set.

Mimi