Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <8f0c3b88-872a-bbae-eaa2-1467b6f386a0@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <8f0c3b88-872a-bbae-eaa2-1467b6f386a0@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20210122181054.32635-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com> <20210122181054.32635-2-eric.snowberg@oracle.com> <399024a1-59fb-12b8-9ea9-9bbee843dbc8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <13EE0575-2F90-4C49-AF5D-365B63D2CB64@oracle.com>
To:     Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
        dwmw2@infradead.org, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, masahiroy@kernel.org,
        michal.lkml@markovi.net, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
        ardb@kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, lszubowi@redhat.com,
        javierm@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3579294.1611849483.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:58:03 +0000
Message-ID: <3579295.1611849483@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Thanks Eric for clarifying. I was confusing it with with the broader mea=
ning
> of revocation i.e. certificate revocation list. To avoid similar confusi=
on in
> the future, I wonder if we should call it as 'blocklist' or 'denylist' a=
s
> suggested in the document. This is to avoid conflicts with actual CRL su=
pport
> if added in the future. I also wonder if we should add the clarification=
 in
> the patch description.

Reject-list might be better.

David