Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1117550pxb; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:23:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzC1ZXOSTu02nkQSCcgNnfMwlcvDrF7xnIEB2wpf6/LF5p1xbc7bvX2lmapyI9UIm266eBN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:60a:: with SMTP id n10mr340807edv.230.1611851006013; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:23:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611851006; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dQgawft6C5e8KArSOrPpSNbf4JczCrqr8IvdQ9F+vbFJadRp+rvWoMZ4TS1bslHmoL 9y7uwBmAyx6Na2pPT5zoMa6XLuHgzcvdAwM19fH2Sjv8SjZ6pEGfEwr3PGLF1qapGVQA 0R3dqPoK7bmwnLBR19uBVacvttMI35zNgbzwzmoLojP/B+UZ6G5jDyNVNGS0YiEqWyN+ H+SPNYLX3EhBFTXkH/VeEy+mylv07h4ojU0Xaf0X6R62OqVJKIOfnzCrdsjUQsQwgK/T a/Af+xu+XWo99b+mrXaaP7OPXkKg9BuWrkkYyuGDOaNJ2sAuxZ6NpgyYnVRgegrpbIqk b9bg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=7CqB0uHK5EWzFO1fg351SIMWbRTAf74xkk1+Ej3BdM8=; b=YCtZeI5J1gXM3BBrtCHKp4Pnr7CXqwoTbLfT9Jw7i1K0OJSvmm5BTQAF1qC5FJpzcv We+FseZfmsiH5nPOgaZKiTYCt5/OB5PzbsSyd3IOSsS9ldyUWh/CbK/XAYpqo9WyW6Xe eIacvduHL6hdooIHVtZqj1YpO0//KQPyP50GXYSH/8TRffwaR/8ZIEaDOGCsFtuw7ROD D72Axhsm2SHORUMtnJbnmYnN7Rc4cN+Su/ONgmEsaAg187WLk24rznv3kSoP/yT/WbLO 7Tx2RAdfsMgDHM7UGTdls6Ek1Gs2U8drqH6Q7WTxBNGJLmTM4RmTB53B/DyJ98mI0Y5z aJBg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Yf1y9I1j; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w27si2769218ejq.673.2021.01.28.08.23.01; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Yf1y9I1j; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231209AbhA1QWW (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:22:22 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39524 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231148AbhA1QWQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:22:16 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C80664DE5; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:21:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1611850895; bh=gQ1uDpOutU/j5JfQn/BFmT/TAvCAM0rxoSpe91vTYq0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Yf1y9I1jecnWXyaMUvO3COBgL5RcMvpqB86lNWqLsMlNFbk8KpWmMSB437QDuQX1+ BfTVmD+NijHPf9CBXnB/8SiJ89TaLyVemwG/y6ItWEFm6bhWRm9tOIxOW/cjKZFGRf DTiqO4bRyqU/7uXDO0anp/hTwc25IE6/lHEdJCUlVycNaWZoZuBLfHkDCKFR+5cqRy CSiEpeWr3Cp5paNfVGYZSSo3XkZbSJI0TzF2CoxUBetCn6tEZGZZ5tr9CpJ+D5u14k O7vYgRKmqHteqXL/3fVj6R4j3VEk6AnQuGZuWtosM/geN86qr3QqU0IvwIxQox9bPu jn3kTcEnEdAOg== Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:21:33 -0800 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chao@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to keep isolation of atomic write Message-ID: References: <20201230075557.108818-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <3923906d-f208-f6c2-f121-5e77e8fb6b28@huawei.com> <98ddd61e-1429-5152-10b1-ac267ec4493d@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <98ddd61e-1429-5152-10b1-ac267ec4493d@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/20, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2021/1/20 3:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/15, Chao Yu wrote: > > > On 2021/1/15 5:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > On 12/30, Chao Yu wrote: > > > > > ThreadA ThreadB > > > > > - f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write > > > > > - write > > > > > - f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write > > > > > - f2fs_commit_inmem_pages > > > > > - f2fs_drop_inmem_pages > > > > > - f2fs_drop_inmem_pages > > > > > - __revoke_inmem_pages > > > > > - f2fs_vm_page_mkwrite > > > > > - set_page_dirty > > > > > - tag ATOMIC_WRITTEN_PAGE and add page > > > > > to inmem_pages list > > > > > - clear_inode_flag(FI_ATOMIC_FILE) > > > > > - f2fs_vm_page_mkwrite > > > > > - set_page_dirty > > > > > - f2fs_update_dirty_page > > > > > - f2fs_trace_pid > > > > > - tag inmem page private to pid > > > > > > > > Hmm, how about removing fs/f2fs/trace.c to make private more complicated > > > > like this? I think we can get IO traces from tracepoints. > > > > > > Hmm, actually, there is are issues, one is the trace IO, the other is the > > > race issue (atomic_start,commit,drop vs mkwrite) which can make isolation > > > semantics of transaction be broken. > > > > > > Or can we avoid atomic file racing with file mmap? > > Otherwise I think we should add i_mmap_sem to avoid the race. > > > > > No, we can't. We may need to find other way to check the race. :) > > Well, any thoughts about this issue? > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > - atomic_start - file_mmap > > > - inode_lock > > > - if (FI_ATOMIC_FILE) return > > > - inode_lock > > > - if (FI_MMAP_FILE) return > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > - truncate > > > > > - f2fs_invalidate_page > > > > > - set page->mapping to NULL > > > > > then it will cause panic once we > > > > > access page->mapping Are we hitting this, since page was referenced by in-mem list? > > > > > > > > > > The root cause is we missed to keep isolation of atomic write in the case > > > > > of commit_atomic_write vs mkwrite, let commit_atomic_write helds i_mmap_sem > > > > > lock to avoid this issue. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > > > > > --- > > > > > v2: > > > > > - use i_mmap_sem to avoid mkwrite racing with below flows: > > > > > * f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write > > > > > * f2fs_drop_inmem_pages > > > > > * f2fs_commit_inmem_pages > > > > > > > > > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++ > > > > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 7 +++++++ > > > > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > > > index 4e6d4b9120a8..a48ec650d691 100644 > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > > > @@ -2050,6 +2050,7 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp) > > > > > goto out; > > > > > down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]); > > > > > + down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem); > > > > > /* > > > > > * Should wait end_io to count F2FS_WB_CP_DATA correctly by > > > > > @@ -2060,6 +2061,7 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp) > > > > > inode->i_ino, get_dirty_pages(inode)); > > > > > ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, 0, LLONG_MAX); > > > > > if (ret) { > > > > > + up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem); > > > > > up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]); > > > > > goto out; > > > > > } > > > > > @@ -2073,6 +2075,7 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp) > > > > > /* add inode in inmem_list first and set atomic_file */ > > > > > set_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE); > > > > > clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_REVOKE_REQUEST); > > > > > + up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem); > > > > > up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]); > > > > > f2fs_update_time(F2FS_I_SB(inode), REQ_TIME); > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > > > index d8570b0359f5..dab870d9faf6 100644 > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > > > @@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ void f2fs_drop_inmem_pages(struct inode *inode) > > > > > struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); > > > > > struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode); > > > > > + down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem); > > > > > + > > > > > while (!list_empty(&fi->inmem_pages)) { > > > > > mutex_lock(&fi->inmem_lock); > > > > > __revoke_inmem_pages(inode, &fi->inmem_pages, > > > > > @@ -344,6 +346,8 @@ void f2fs_drop_inmem_pages(struct inode *inode) > > > > > sbi->atomic_files--; > > > > > } > > > > > spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]); > > > > > + > > > > > + up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem); > > > > > } > > > > > void f2fs_drop_inmem_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page) > > > > > @@ -467,6 +471,7 @@ int f2fs_commit_inmem_pages(struct inode *inode) > > > > > f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true); > > > > > down_write(&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]); > > > > > + down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem); > > > > > f2fs_lock_op(sbi); > > > > > set_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_COMMIT); > > > > > @@ -478,6 +483,8 @@ int f2fs_commit_inmem_pages(struct inode *inode) > > > > > clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_COMMIT); > > > > > f2fs_unlock_op(sbi); > > > > > + > > > > > + up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem); > > > > > up_write(&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]); > > > > > return err; > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.29.2 > > > > . > > > > > > . > >