Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1302715pxb; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:54:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwa9FDjCjMb85JDPT/6eqWz/f2WWRvQHepbUgaxkacEysaClFVSQ9jRBj9SNmINU/n2TwbI X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2e0d:: with SMTP id n13mr1295944eji.554.1611867278800; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:54:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611867278; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rRLZ26VKSnWlTP9qIf57UnOreI45SyHw+AChyaZjNuCu6qQmIf3kcEsl2auCVHhbPc RbGTftPEAZRre2RaxorLVPqYdwEKfwDSVZJxhi+bu+B9MSpG24QdxuRDGCAlWMYb6r07 SGCXwZDQfbDsV+roEvfnY0EI0rShAZBKueh2PrsxRBofveXT8b3NYXGYLccxiLTv9nkK b7Pv/n0iuoxV3McffsIQ1qk2nvyMyfUDvOfkBou7yAM84bAq02xvleZUq087IEFvtJaI WOVwoyR8HAAacbYkENh3ppUX3Wy0wELB/AfGgpUYc/ZsftFaLeNgukmpBT32cbux8KWq T/Rg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=NcddACCn93f04dz5TVhfdu2SHCwwTrtyvy4hNEh3JFU=; b=ouSzO4+HF5kExl7XOCW9CHjb3eIAxSYfBjgT9p+QS8YaU7ZI1WegQxc0T6WHwaM2x/ UmYT687j2mjjqZdi03hciRbQ1rAkCgztbFi+yatY07XgWaRMZg3nstwdrV+eWPQJIo+w sgCFBFEG1BjxKynS+h86VJiqCBt59DVgN1RnTt+YqS5gibUiAnVf1bQ0jfuhjFSi5+w0 t43Hb5vy39NxmKaGSy8MAqs6BGCk6RSioVMr4DTCGONofi4RF2hRHl/LZ9WuByqzJUKp opTo/sCwHZJXJdoDBcbP6Gvhzf/tG6U+sgzJmNzDE8CcGdChWI7f9jzuZKjIMHROI2iU qEyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b24si3358835ejv.374.2021.01.28.12.54.13; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:54:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231156AbhA1Uvo (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:51:44 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:57024 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229835AbhA1Uvi (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:51:38 -0500 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1l5EFk-002oc7-0l; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:50:56 -0700 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1l5EFi-0007vO-Nl; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:50:55 -0700 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Miklos Szeredi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, overlayfs , LSM , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner References: <20210119162204.2081137-1-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20210119162204.2081137-3-mszeredi@redhat.com> <8735yw8k7a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20210128165852.GA20974@mail.hallyn.com> <87o8h8x1a6.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:49:35 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Miklos Szeredi's message of "Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:38:00 +0100") Message-ID: <87tur0vlb4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1l5EFi-0007vO-Nl;;;mid=<87tur0vlb4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19ay7DlYNZuYViioRwECggdIxy8OTBSDAk= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa05.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels, XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;Miklos Szeredi X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 494 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 8 (1.6%), b_tie_ro: 6 (1.3%), parse: 0.81 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (2.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.97 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 14 (2.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.30 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 0.97 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 92 (18.6%), check_bayes: 90 (18.2%), b_tokenize: 5 (1.1%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 1.88 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 74 (15.0%), b_finish: 0.82 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 153 (30.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.63 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.1 (0.4%), poll_dns_idle: 194 (39.3%), tests_pri_10: 1.75 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 207 (41.9%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] security.capability: fix conversions on getxattr X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miklos Szeredi writes: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:24 PM Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> > > That's however just an optimization (AFAICS) that only makes sense if > it helps a read world workload. I'm not convinced that that's the > case. It is definitely a different issue. From previous conversations with Serge, there is a concern with a sysadmin wanting to see what is actually on disk. In case there are bugs that care about the different layout. Just passing everything through when no translation is necessary will allow that kind of diagnosis. As your patch demonstrates we already have had bugs in this area so being able to get at the raw data may help people if they get into a situation where bugs matter. Eric