Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:31:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:31:23 -0500 Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]:57526 "EHLO mailout01.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:31:07 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Thomas Koeller To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 00:30:08 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01110523561405.00641@sarkovy.koeller.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, 5. November 2001 23:24, Mark Hahn wrote: > > please read the scheduler; it's not that bad, especially if you > ignore the SMP case. normal procs are only considered if there > are no runnable RT procs. I know the scheduler works this way. But does it have to? What I meant to do was suggesting an improvement. Thomas -- Thomas Koeller tkoeller@gmx.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/