Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:30:20 +0200
From:   Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_GETDENTS64
Message-ID: <20210128223020.GG186627@wantstofly.org>
References: <20210123114152.GA120281@wantstofly.org>
 <20210123232754.GA308988@casper.infradead.org>
 <39a9b1da-bbcc-daa0-12e9-3eb776658564@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <39a9b1da-bbcc-daa0-12e9-3eb776658564@kernel.dk>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:

> >> IORING_OP_GETDENTS64 behaves like getdents64(2) and takes the same
> > 
> > Could we drop the '64'?  We don't, for example, have IOURING_OP_FADVISE64
> > even though that's the name of the syscall.
> 
> Agreed, only case we do mimic the names are for things like
> IORING_OP_OPENAT2 where it does carry meaning. For this one, it should
> just be IORING_OP_GETDENTS.

OK, I've made this change.