Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2018208pxb; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:46:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfWnu4kCIgfNsRDYSmIXYnpQz/3gjWpBWw6LVG8UXEb/m42o8BWQLMhAlMdddf8l/lPOyh X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:104e:: with SMTP id e14mr6833239edu.316.1611946007967; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:46:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611946007; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=M/ZsfVdKcicQaKXzj4g+DZ3RWd57UEn37/NzosF1ubNppZDbvfuFhJB7Rl9dMbh4E5 LDBkWtaMScRQwEwVhzux6fAxoIkj3qDwMgOSvONNegDUfdgQ1tmC8XBfalTFU1ZeHHwG X5rcs9vL63QQgbaC0bwD2NSIO+CGYS0Q9VDtUXdL0r4ibIOH9gJlx9fDijLOyptI0R/j boS0EydyzHDK0BOz/TIQ+0Rj+TsuQgfpPl3BgN5g+1OwisORVrv+VUnIIbyKCQQXBPHN YaTmxRwVugHieZJE9s13py551lPFo3leDrKfkiI6AU7ewtclUA0rqfj1JOGbhJQUHREh ZfKA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:from:subject; bh=UWZ/EnyUmif10m2fIOGWaHnXbb5J48pjKqCKJ67ZooQ=; b=jqPlRygj2rIB1blbw9QQ6S9dObDhvzXx4yCjU7r0HV8tA8oejzxiI8BryIdSpoHUI4 ldLud2zVl2qCt7bq7NdrSmMB8/TbKj4MOtGFNGLH4CUs6hgh9nNnRFEDa7+g5OtzhMxw 58pmxDQyUfj/COvaMeRQxRZAi9Nr7VsAqVk4dlsiIzI3g5nRCLGvVGxyXu+qSf/3Jyn0 JGPZK5Bs+m1zQczKbHN5/52JiPn4fanQB8/eG95lddi8Qwxxo2yIHGenLJKHJIlh2YGm 1e/Ao49p56dz8yy0mvTLZzIZzf/O1xrfXcqjKmu218g8T1lQJm5Qxdou7f5LvjgovQB7 bfnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id zo20si5376157ejb.302.2021.01.29.10.46.23; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:46:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232561AbhA2Snh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:43:37 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:52864 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232012AbhA2Snb (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:43:31 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C0813A1; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.37.12.11] (unknown [10.37.12.11]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97AF73F885; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:42:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] kasan: Add report for async mode From: Vincenzo Frascino To: Andrey Konovalov , Alexander Potapenko Cc: Branislav Rankov , Marco Elver , Catalin Marinas , Evgenii Stepanov , LKML , kasan-dev , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , Andrew Morton , Will Deacon , Linux ARM References: <20210126134603.49759-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <20210126134603.49759-4-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Message-ID: <8021dbc4-8745-2430-8d52-6236ae8c47c7@arm.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:46:38 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrey, On 1/29/21 6:16 PM, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: > What I meant is instead of: > > if (addr) trace_error_report_end(...); > > you might want to do: > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)) trace_error_report_end(...); > > because, could make sense to trace 0 in other cases? > > I could not find the implementation of trace_error_report_end() hence I am not > really sure on what it does. I figured it out how trace_error_report_end() works. And in doing that I realized that the problem is sync vs async, hence I agree with what you are proposing: if (addr) trace_error_report_end(...); I will post v10 shortly. If we want to trace the async mode we can improve it in -rc1. -- Regards, Vincenzo