Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: rS4XURAalZkPgLpfToHZEgxrW0ZODLXsiMsafLs/DchGJd5pAOASHuXF79bZwMCqhmhG5KtA1G
 iVxmFblmwtcQ==
IronPort-SDR: YKpYFCq+rRt4zqUspD1JImoQHJ9ODV3X6/aXQ4uP4iER2tVzPmgw/RbyRy3mSTJpd8CYqX9jRr
 r0VhB8vP9R9A==
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 02/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for user-mode
 control-flow protection
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
        Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
        Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
References: <40a5a9b5-9c83-473d-5f62-a16ecde50f2a@intel.com>
 <86F8CE62-A94B-46BD-9A29-DBE1CC14AA83@amacapital.net>
 <58d5f029-ee8a-ca93-f0e6-0278db22e208@intel.com>
 <20210129204601.GG27841@zn.tnic>
From:   "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Message-ID: <9061f862-8711-2ca2-b737-8d171de2f0c2@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:13:26 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210129204601.GG27841@zn.tnic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 1/29/2021 12:46 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:33:43PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> In that case is there any reason to keep the "depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL"?
> 
> Probably not. I haven't heard of the AMD implementation being somehow
> different from Intel's.
> 

Ok, I will remove it.