Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 23:09:39 +0100
From:   Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc:     Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
        Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
        Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5
Message-ID: <20210129220939.GY4020736@tucnak>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <20210129194318.2125748-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
 <20210129194318.2125748-3-ndesaulniers@google.com>
 <CA+icZUX4q-JhCo+UZ9T3FhbC_gso-oaB0OR9KdH5iEpoGZyqVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOdnj1Np62+eOiTOCRXSW6GLSv4hmvtWaz=0aTZEEot_dhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210129205702.GS4020736@tucnak>
 <CAKwvOdmuSaf28dOdP8Yo6+RyiviMNKcq8JY=-qgbwjbPVwHmLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210129211102.GT4020736@tucnak>
 <CAKwvOdm-+xK=diSKKXXnS2m1+W6QZ70c7cRKTbtVF=dWi1_8_w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdm-+xK=diSKKXXnS2m1+W6QZ70c7cRKTbtVF=dWi1_8_w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 02:05:59PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Ah, I see.  Then I should update the script I add
> (scripts/test_dwarf5_support.sh) to feature detect that bug, since
> it's the latest of the bunch.  Also, should update my comment to note
> that this requires binutils greater than 2.35.1 (which is what I have,
> which fails, since the backport landed in ... what?!)  How was this
> backported to 2.35
> (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195#c12, Jan 26
> 2021) when binutils-2_35_1 was tagged sept 19 2020?  Or will there be
> a binutils 2.35.2 point release?

AFAIK yes, soon.

	Jakub