Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210129194318.2125748-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
 <20210129194318.2125748-3-ndesaulniers@google.com> <CA+icZUX4q-JhCo+UZ9T3FhbC_gso-oaB0OR9KdH5iEpoGZyqVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOdnj1Np62+eOiTOCRXSW6GLSv4hmvtWaz=0aTZEEot_dhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUWsyjDY58ZZ0MAVfWqBJ8FUSpM6=_5aqPcRTfX2W8Y-+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOd=mHvEtto37rzFMfsFYe2e-Cp2MAiyRYxHWPdc-HbT8EA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUWxK9fdV8PNGqbQrOFmSZ2Ts4nNqfVMMNUh5u79Ld7hjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUUo6URpxHh6_Tppv9_Z1dyhGDB2OqSCY3yRw72aA0EbMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOdmWx0reabY-S3nXfTZuhs-_SP7pbb0uHyGeaNSQnm8eRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUWsncyKvxPZ5g=a3ssWy=cYahsU6hprM3n=jFUmnjPC6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOdk4kG-_c3inNj9ry_xUU9SQE-2AqQp40YL_V=6SHU6E=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+icZUX576Rt7HJ4hvrwRTCC2pTmoH-Yu-haU+MDb8B6yADAYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUX576Rt7HJ4hvrwRTCC2pTmoH-Yu-haU+MDb8B6yADAYA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:31:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmq=L_ob-WpNBE-fSc3oYXT10ZvttfiXiZw3+SxaWWy-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5
To:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
        Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com>,
        Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:23 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:21 PM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:11 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:09 PM Nick Desaulniers
> > > <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:13 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:09 PM Nick Desaulniers
> > > > > > <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you tell me please what is the precise command line invocation of
> > > > > > > make and which source file you observed this on so that I can
> > > > > > > reproduce?
> > > >
> > > > If you don't send me your invocation of `make`, I cannot help you.
> > > >
> > >
> > > /usr/bin/perf_5.10 stat make V=1 -j4 LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1
> > > PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole LOCALVERSION=-10-amd64-clang12
> > > -lto-pgo KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 KBUILD_BUILD_HOST=iniza
> > > KBUILD_BUILD_USER=sedat.dilek@gmail.com
> > > KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP=2021-01-29 bindeb-pkg
> > > KDEB_PKGVERSION=5.11.0~rc5-10~bullseye+dileks1
> >
> > $ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 -j72 defconfig
> > $ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 -j72 menuconfig
> > <enable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO and CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5>
> > $ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 -j72 V=1 &> log.txt
> > $ grep '\-g -gdwarf-5 -g -gdwarf-5' log.txt | wc -l
> > 0
> > $ grep '\-g -gdwarf-5' log.txt | wc -l
> > 2517
> >
> > Do have the patch applied twice, perhaps?
> >
>
> Switched to my v6 local Git branch and invoked above make line I gave you.
> I still see that double.
> Looks like I need some "undrunken" switch.

Can you follow my steps precisely to see whether it's your .config?
Perhaps there is a config that duplicates DEBUG_CFLAGS that is not set
in the defconfig?  If so, it's still harmless to specify the same
commands twice, and likely isn't introduced by this patch set if so;
so I'm not sure how much more effort is worth pursuing.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers