Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2154481pxb; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:01:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+ZLP2t+OuYV/1C2t985CyjKTLnsoMi20Ou0zp81AYM25txgILATwF+pzVylSoFVbOqRAk X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a384:: with SMTP id k4mr6691934ejz.194.1611961283062; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:01:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611961283; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eD2cJRZg4s8jI21utDL6u7ZmVINV/VA7Yj1AZIGrTPn7yzPcifLkm+cEdnM+nRl34q kDquvfNZUXw2UrxRzUA8KB2lNJkhSLQkyDAQsv+WvPYrwN0Qktnv1EBwyZKI9yT+UicU Ej68XlV+KqaJxIzlBpoieNRahi4Csl5rDZFGUaC5YMEfdjMbv8upA21evPIbHfq60e9x LW7fnNANcJnsHQL1Od9WOqcQClnWQ4sd69L+SLjOV7xWe3fLVlTOMUtnKgQ8lLdW6D09 NyGjJ8zBKz16EW7vNC4bY5w4rPB3Hxh0ls9maMtf/uCZEqR/wKq98oPSUXQ/CHHHE6Sw FbEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=o4Q1tSH4q+4QKKx1rau01ODSyRP6qNf3fJXU1qVP31E=; b=oRMym/Y7vWA5mVGNaWP2TZTnGAb1SKBR7VPYfYtvhdRq0EGdrXt4YK1kU/SHVKMwLp zptNB2f+bSHXFjQLl/VYShP5uM3+ELiD9nvjTLVw1Zi08c3dPiXdAtyQp/J3LpxWM8z9 cVTwbLumbAPN2p7cN9sRfYUpOzXRsq6dZx877JBiMqJNWVCgjolORNYz9aovygbbeXo1 bs1uvxHHZDo40ind8+rzI3I94TwTIxRNx7ogC/k11VoqnaMjdZVLnkKG/LWbh658xrhR CG4reppTTC4OQIqXjaIcDewrkOVsffD+/0h45LcRANoYDDIrTpmSP+E1cH2Dd/zsnoAM NPhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v5si6461465edc.346.2021.01.29.15.00.58; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:01:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231158AbhA2W5l (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:57:41 -0500 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:37276 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229683AbhA2W5j (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:57:39 -0500 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1l5ch8-00El2W-7c; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:56:50 -0700 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1l5ch7-002DyO-3c; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:56:49 -0700 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Miklos Szeredi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner References: <20210119162204.2081137-1-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20210119162204.2081137-3-mszeredi@redhat.com> <8735yw8k7a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20210128165852.GA20974@mail.hallyn.com> <87o8h8x1a6.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20210129154839.GC1130@mail.hallyn.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:55:29 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20210129154839.GC1130@mail.hallyn.com> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:48:39 -0600") Message-ID: <87im7fuzdq.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1l5ch7-002DyO-3c;;;mid=<87im7fuzdq.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19X3waKsp4zjyMN3J12N2O9HZ4lenytO+A= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels, XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;"Serge E. Hallyn" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 397 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 9 (2.4%), b_tie_ro: 8 (2.0%), parse: 1.01 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 14 (3.5%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.68 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 5.0 (1.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.28 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.08 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 56 (14.2%), check_bayes: 55 (13.8%), b_tokenize: 8 (1.9%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.6%), b_comp_prob: 2.6 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 34 (8.7%), b_finish: 1.04 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 276 (69.5%), check_dkim_signature: 0.77 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.6 (0.7%), poll_dns_idle: 0.31 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 3.8 (1.0%), tests_pri_500: 25 (6.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] security.capability: fix conversions on getxattr X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 02:19:13PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: >> >> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:34:49PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Miklos Szeredi writes: >> >> >> >> > If a capability is stored on disk in v2 format cap_inode_getsecurity() will >> >> > currently return in v2 format unconditionally. >> >> > >> >> > This is wrong: v2 cap should be equivalent to a v3 cap with zero rootid, >> >> > and so the same conversions performed on it. >> >> > >> >> > If the rootid cannot be mapped v3 is returned unconverted. Fix this so >> >> > that both v2 and v3 return -EOVERFLOW if the rootid (or the owner of the fs >> >> > user namespace in case of v2) cannot be mapped in the current user >> >> > namespace. >> >> >> >> This looks like a good cleanup. >> > >> > Sorry, I'm not following. Why is this a good cleanup? Why should >> > the xattr be shown as faked v3 in this case? >> >> If the reader is in &init_user_ns. If the filesystem was mounted in a >> user namespace. Then the reader looses the information that the > > Can you be more precise about "filesystem was mounted in a user namespace"? > Is this a FUSE thing, the fs is marked as being mounted in a non-init userns? > If that's a possible case, then yes that must be represented as v3. Using > is_v2header() may be the simpler way to check for that, but the more accurate > check would be "is it v2 header and mounted by init_user_ns". I think the filesystems current relevant are fuse,overlayfs,ramfs,tmpfs. > Basically yes, in as many cases as possible we want to just give a v2 > cap because more userspace knows what to do with that, but a non-init-userns > mounted fs which provides a v2 fscap should have it represented as v3 cap > with rootid being the kuid that owns the userns. That is the case we that is being fixed in the patch. > Or am I still thinking wrongly? Wouldn't be entirely surprised :) No you got it. Eric