Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP045Ao_Zb0HGg0=bvUeV6GjX=-3fz0ScsvM_jE7VsZcVk_-tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <C479ACCB-A1A5-4422-8120-999E8D54314B@amacapital.net>
In-Reply-To: <C479ACCB-A1A5-4422-8120-999E8D54314B@amacapital.net>
From:   Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Date:   Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:27:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP045AoMRNjvVd1PdHvdf-nn3LNpTDp66sp+SAmZgNU888iFQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: TIF_SINGLESTEP handling is still broken
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Robert O'Callahan" <rocallahan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 2:20 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote=
:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 31, 2021, at 2:08 PM, Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> wrote:
> >
> > =EF=BB=BFOn Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 2:04 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapit=
al.net> wrote:
> >> Indeed, and I have tests for this.
> >
> > Do you mean you already have a test case or that you would like a
> > minimized test case?
>
> A smallish test that we could stick in selftests would be great if that=
=E2=80=99s straightforward.

I'll look into it.

- Kyle