Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp3949570pxb; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:39:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSOur7+YeWwEp+Lw423Rf0ESh/La0rPDPd9BLiiMhOqHTBM7gYZhtLl4Czjz54dlmXdLpz X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7f98:: with SMTP id f24mr18447733ejr.75.1612197566625; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 08:39:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612197566; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gSSUHwxEjvv374X77pd65CBnWNZZDNVps2xaDT5/UuCSBtOiH4jJuTJWEdz413qVOW d4xAYSKBZQgIvk/yfpSRjGEHG1FIX/L+RBKODJSyxk5EJCPvs36M6Wk+AU4C/o7DO7L9 R7pJBbjwE08l9AN6ytNzQfdboCHNreInaLrG7M358jWEDiVVintRNJpASaK9KYSthFrh hLOMBghlNsWzZuF7jj3f+pZ7FMkxxDSE9kGJAUKhCjgEsh364EmQLbCUrYitQ4GHma5s FsEw5Tl1PhBU/sS6gAQDPTe2088B8iAV5mKkf1wCl3Vc1LnXWpfv3D9TkpaQNNdm0RhX uvVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ByC7KaYON/0i8vGx/iI5+UVlKpwznPmeNqa08Xo2VqM=; b=Owmz8Y8iQmWAW7EOZqTlc9vthHcMHUMvXqjFH4XEWy3g8Y9omyCskNkqJrfhDiJ7i1 /Ljl2qcbcfBTnlzSH6x9IgAEJNizpR77zeKeaBz83dQUEpjeMRwRBpzG52Cud5yZXngh 5pgsYp+yJHV2yyIRXZIA+S2RJT8DzA0W/suQJUWH4PzYDrpYWxVQdu01UCPL2DBKq32q eqfqnwPWPx8Vw2SbjglJUDwHQoECH5Xv+pjwd7LvSH/WD2FcVEiHAeAgHezE/MGWsEHU A7OFtuJnQ8h5eihoUI6WH6hG/pioMDyfFWqtTELE4SnC8XC6ETXhbIJ6PvnsVOy/bpWu lbKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=Ba2xUY6l; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ho43si10074627ejc.421.2021.02.01.08.39.01; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 08:39:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=Ba2xUY6l; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229819AbhBAQiH (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:38:07 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59616 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229763AbhBAQiH (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:38:07 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 599D364EA3; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:37:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1612197446; bh=MZxvcpnmVx3880fwWHX/0liaHRRZCs/cVrQn2DLd2DI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ba2xUY6lHpmJJ0dBVwyHP4RsHpWtlYDTF+N8I+2witdjooSExtICa+IQx4Fnvue+b NECujr6gE/EiP+MWtnwo00cDjPbiYuxATTxJJl2XGWg++fC8XYxuhlYaJKUrHlcwv7 fgsbUzho7Ngy8AG7CXzuZn4G0T+F4CAObBTBMue0= Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 17:37:23 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Dwaipayan Ray Cc: Joe Perches , Lukas Bulwahn , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] Patches from the future - can checkpatch help? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 10:04:01PM +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote: > Hi, > on linux-next, > $ git log --pretty=format:"%h%x09%ad" | awk '$6>2021 {print $1}' > gives: > 4a2d78822fdf > 12ca45fea91c > 09f2724a786f > > These are patches from the year 2085, 2037 and 2030 respectively. > > Would a checkpatch rule be helpful for these or are they too > isolated to waste runtime on? Dates come from your email client, not the patch itself, how is checkpatch going to catch this? thanks, greg k-h