Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <7836898a-0a42-5c9b-3a42-7ff4c7a03ea4@linux.ibm.com>
References: <7836898a-0a42-5c9b-3a42-7ff4c7a03ea4@linux.ibm.com> <20210201151910.1465705-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com> <32177.1612196003@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
To:     Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patrick@puiterwijk.org,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <33902.1612197412.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:36:52 +0000
Message-ID: <33903.1612197412@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> 1) the whole series goes through the crypto tree
> 
> 2) I make the OIDs addition patch 1 that both keyrings and crypto take
> separately?

The first might be easiest, but 2 is okay also.  You'll just need to give
myself and Herbert separate branches to pull, rooted on the same commit.

Btw, what do patches 2-4 do if patch 1 isn't applied?


David