Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp4012493pxb; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:06:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfuH5KV+uqpvo8rmzYEz23MwL+NnjA5/0/bCbJIyuSqwKgMhVIrRTt/Whp3gr8a0h4fMz+ X-Received: by 2002:a50:e3c4:: with SMTP id c4mr19997647edm.77.1612202791440; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:06:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612202791; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UfUU41XLKRpZMR8D6K0GYtkLCcENBnPn0Fod4gmRd7F/Wlpce7QwHUuZKr1psI+O1z bQXkMAJ0tIzJ0ZblxXpLZxwb5+tLwOtcBpC0hXGM4d4u4draI9qQvlkQTqTw7vjgAdTH GDXlcDR+GXUCr3lqHFE4zP9EmAvzUvUxkGwCxzkuPJRupmk1sVNEzaOEuufX66PVAPKF c3AQlRvzT4WykKQo2mc1xQWebLbwVwysfJUzIw/nX0IBbas8Ck6j9leR/RSk5xZsH2TC sTw0UV6N50eqry0PYLd88rwwYa6WCV2UwwfHANxnRRrjf/tmMl+7/GfNIv1lqLKwaFqg HwwA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=fKxZfOhT/DW7ng3x2hQg+/AugT9c3F61tbpfJY+S9fg=; b=bkz75wkrlXjeWTl/sTV7y+zNcvG2Q7iw197zrsEXqNDSh5kSMF+2AKsHcegPjYSPaX EUlqOFywTEn6BhSE8yIjodpJYAE7up0GGBJ9BXdgjXBUWE4UMVktYdBQMJaK3y6HuDDC ZHWjWtvr5OXrabC/LSuqQJ40NIdMd09r+kfGOLQdnTpRNa2giF2qBr+IjoN7qOpZpoD6 4AnQyu2lYP5uMARrtF+ltPb0JXzmeXVPwrTacX/nIyKe++X73ELXGdBSMkcKAH+C26JW CnJHAKvRucUarDCPvh7JZXGvA1cSnbzHePT6sCgJ7B8MCZP/O99Za+WwAeCkfgyF1Qyj pkzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g4si11384191edu.256.2021.02.01.10.05.59; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230091AbhBASEX (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:04:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:36674 "EHLO mail-wr1-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230110AbhBASEV (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:04:21 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 6so17627825wri.3; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:04:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fKxZfOhT/DW7ng3x2hQg+/AugT9c3F61tbpfJY+S9fg=; b=o0ja68jjfo0vxAZuQK1dJm18nv709vSsKmLfIwnUOxB/tO4pA0T7vf1atU+1tlx0zO 3EZaev+FtG0p32/dhSFuWVfF8ySvs6dz+gOsNZ4IuH514agCQHDWwbYv1gV3v33Ca7pV khvqZPcr+1qAE4opjFbHmue3U9DIPV4X3eAmymoM5E7DTB03Ul5Qs0tCWpGbjhwrFgFa ooWhIlZdTHQsmn4mIv7o/sWQeMuDQwFcaxQY5V3aWabb6UCmcGV/OiRGBP4MV35S78ZA MDLMNiQFwhQ3BUSJ0PJKxu7/e1YNTwD7K6S+irIBhpFt9ESL+ldeX00M/eRkCt/Bjyfv xEOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530b6sfj7V5vBEToDA36W8IPbwp1yh0B83praLVcMg9VX3/RT7o4 I2IHukhV52dUTmPKv7PxW74= X-Received: by 2002:adf:d4ce:: with SMTP id w14mr18936280wrk.89.1612202619004; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:03:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from kozik-lap (adsl-84-226-167-205.adslplus.ch. [84.226.167.205]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t17sm42062wmi.46.2021.02.01.10.03.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:03:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:03:35 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Timon Baetz Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Sebastian Reichel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] power: supply: max8997_charger: Switch to new binding Message-ID: <20210201180335.rrsqfvbcmxvx64gf@kozik-lap> References: <20210130172747.2022977-1-timon.baetz@protonmail.com> <20210130172747.2022977-4-timon.baetz@protonmail.com> <20210131172840.fxaadhhsafa4aeex@kozik-lap> <20210201083128.18499ffd.timon.baetz@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210201083128.18499ffd.timon.baetz@protonmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:26:42AM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 18:28:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 05:30:14PM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote: > > > Get regulator from parent device's node and extcon by name. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Timon Baetz > > > --- > > > drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c b/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c > > > index 321bd6b8ee41..625d8cc4312a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c > > > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c > > > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int max8997_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > int ret = 0; > > > struct charger_data *charger; > > > struct max8997_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); > > > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > > > struct i2c_client *i2c = iodev->i2c; > > > struct max8997_platform_data *pdata = iodev->pdata; > > > struct power_supply_config psy_cfg = {}; > > > @@ -237,20 +238,23 @@ static int max8997_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > return PTR_ERR(charger->battery); > > > } > > > > > > + // grab regulator from parent device's node > > > + pdev->dev.of_node = iodev->dev->of_node; > > > charger->reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "charger"); > > > + pdev->dev.of_node = np; > > > > I think the device does not have its own node anymore. Or did I miss > > something? > > The idea is to reset of_node to whatever it was before (NULL) and basically > leave the device unchanged. Probe might run again because of deferral. Good point. > > > > if (IS_ERR(charger->reg)) { > > > if (PTR_ERR(charger->reg) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > dev_info(&pdev->dev, "couldn't get charger regulator\n"); > > > } > > > - charger->edev = extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, 0); > > > - if (IS_ERR(charger->edev)) { > > > - if (PTR_ERR(charger->edev) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > > + charger->edev = extcon_get_extcon_dev("max8997-muic"); > > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(charger->edev)) { > > > + if (!charger->edev) > > > > Isn't NULL returned when there is simply no extcon? It's different than > > deferred probe. Returning here EPROBE_DEFER might lead to infinite probe > > tries (on every new device probe) instead of just failing it. > > extcon_get_extcon_dev() just loops through all registered extcon devices > and compared names. It will return NULL when "max8997-muic" isn't > registered yet. extcon_get_extcon_dev() never returns EPROBE_DEFER so > checking for NULL seems to be the only way. Other drivers using that > function also do NULL check and return EPROBE_DEFER. Indeed, thanks for clarification. Looks good: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof