Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp223083pxb; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 03:38:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzL8A7QucWR9C9pV/LLWBGAeV2Oj4uX634WbRWDc3qBrKDr3ayREqSSYlmj6kZ5A5DREuck X-Received: by 2002:a50:bc14:: with SMTP id j20mr23179624edh.381.1612265923676; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 03:38:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612265923; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Z7uOTjQ0y9rant9TelmuZLMyt0xWzPQXXY36HaJZIb8BTFWKOEx8iRlzu8dJmZ0vNP cglzwSCyNAk6uooxqbwPv14inGYcChmyb7OlZQdtQ00vlkAS4jsi9l4BCCYa56kUVHHh 3SzLoE5HkP29QhansNYUREiFrOv50ExO72jO1rBjXMyRs/fyvQSVfUUMQShsNGzmA+hI t9hYzCllUNi3wMfc6rLiud+wcrlVn8waZN78UY540seQWLbftM2r3Skj+h83/cH+n4LV 2Y5+ZjmvCsM5YHXHSYTGrjKxT0Wroi29zWqoVXALoZBZqjmgwWCgqsTpHXHhEZF4dP6N WtFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=AGgqgHamdRqzikHPzrH0th7Wd823gu44+E2MxeyTpkI=; b=Rurs6LmR+CD22RLEIdVgPQuBdqLtYVzMJBOKk6gK333Rm/KgUmnbnsfLhRNiSw+rk3 LCW5qw8lD1ycw9Ix7VimFXITzWNcCr3L337+9np2LmlTDHKic7JomOL63WpzxxOTrWyA pZLRWFKbaS/SXwFvoTf7k9VIWVQHlasSpzksrVG+NGeHC0yvZpRcU1n8HfpXMzpJGs4y x0Ih7Vb5zN57ixpfYKv/g3zLVpir1mVOUgmRgvqQEMnvLAdktzS6gcqQf2FVN/TODuqL 8A4I+mcJeCbbJy8D8vxw5ytG/SqNttwMby9NekxXak816DBoqGNsEdRVJt8jPyk6UBpW whqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=eA1YvFBH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i20si12124878ejz.447.2021.02.02.03.38.18; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 03:38:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=eA1YvFBH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231438AbhBBLgW (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 06:36:22 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59592 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230248AbhBBLfI (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 06:35:08 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC32464E9B; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:34:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1612265666; bh=iQZjdrytDnYe4+JE2zLjRm1WSmA5jVNSNUrdiPWQqaA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=eA1YvFBH617s0j/ZHp9BrVaGBQse3Roq/akpIFgO8h4YK7KAtGXqfn+8F30qXEGn7 P3fVr3ENGAQ4m9QgKtpkUPG4jrbeBxRwk7RTtuxPmir9B4L60SU088ooeP6orMQHDu Spuos6n/rMOJ8jJtTVDIgcik1eTfAqlgK9b0v8LRuK6tRytdQ4aUfUVyJ+18iaAhoh FGJe5MlorJAi0JzgkEjW89Rh17W/sNrttGvuWEjyOLa8x+94QTjk8A/f3kJhKLkBt2 R3ftH5ewKRfAoHATLdIPutAS0p0/+FYXfweTB/hYQNJvVly/Qpi0aaRKGr5gaxG5zN PN6NIwhGI3Lbw== Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 05:34:23 -0600 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: Lars Povlsen , Steen Hegelund , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Linus Walleij Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: [REPORT][next] pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: out-of-bounds bug in sgpio_clrsetbits() Message-ID: <20210202113423.GA277746@embeddedor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, While addressing some out-of-bounds warnings, I found the following bug: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c:154:57: warning: array subscript 10 is above array bounds of ‘const u8[10]’ {aka ‘const unsigned char[10]’} [-Warray-bounds] The bug was introduced by commit be2dc859abd4 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Add irq support (for sparx5)"): 575 sgpio_clrsetbits(bank->priv, REG_INT_TRIGGER + SGPIO_MAX_BITS, addr.bit, 576 BIT(addr.port), (!!(type & 0x2)) << addr.port); REG_INT_TRIGGER + SGPIO_MAX_BITS turns out to be 10, which is outside the boundaries of priv->properties->regoff[] at line 154: 151 static inline void sgpio_clrsetbits(struct sgpio_priv *priv, 152 u32 rno, u32 off, u32 clear, u32 set) 153 { 154 u32 __iomem *reg = &priv->regs[priv->properties->regoff[rno] + off]; 155 u32 val = readl(reg); 156 157 val &= ~clear; 158 val |= set; 159 160 writel(val, reg); 161 } because priv->properties->regoff[] is an array of MAXREG elements, with MAXREG representing the value of 10 in the following enum: 28 enum { 29 REG_INPUT_DATA, 30 REG_PORT_CONFIG, 31 REG_PORT_ENABLE, 32 REG_SIO_CONFIG, 33 REG_SIO_CLOCK, 34 REG_INT_POLARITY, 35 REG_INT_TRIGGER, 36 REG_INT_ACK, 37 REG_INT_ENABLE, 38 REG_INT_IDENT, 39 MAXREG 40 }; 52 struct sgpio_properties { 53 int arch; 54 int flags; 55 u8 regoff[MAXREG]; 56 }; Thanks -- Gustavo