Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp240924pxb; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 04:08:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbwn4Si0GTy9gNQxuT+u5LWuA4J2wy+CfFdwYUBOi5LaJOiihqrdSHbqa21RcTFYt2zyY+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:20a7:: with SMTP id pw7mr22128207ejb.283.1612267695887; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 04:08:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612267695; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ELfEAV4mzcLF83AWCNym1EBwS+DJbl6N726r94YmyKpsnSkKoK9ELv+qVRJYvZby5g QztCTWx04mpABjXezs2jBtjFApU3doJskjk4UBBP/JfomAXuob906qYaeEkTWUJOKN33 PxwJCoffiShu3ld45ouJlON9QBMlqxRMf6zVtCLbO/o/DPvDOuJDdVF/KhR6CeB8oazE q0Hx5IBoCoj7XNHmtbers3V3PCQeaKzn7MVKMiAYH5daRFYud+euyYx5UChXVEpWGek0 qayWw6vQL7i+IgQ6I/auXm+ulyaqxqBE8tb35wuc8hWRmDW72v+Y3k6KSLhyPEKQ+ly/ 1V2A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:subject:from:dkim-signature; bh=ZJZa8ktkwaZW4AbOUUEv4pH4i7/84OjW4Q1Eqgk5LoI=; b=m0HFfqSHVkbjQg9JywYTj6kyRWCxHLOypKOcvAiRmws9cWCPyFlneRQFE4A/aif7bO rTSdsMHOZVLT46F3LHwW6GJgj9LzlsHHJrSDc/Q6OtwzegqFXRhqU2lEwzeeVY0R6wNX PAi7+W3duDaulWiV/mGXjWkNeapdGVL0njUk6sKusG979pxoxicZTUmiR6zq9q2nBhTF p0RDYKatTYVhMDhnjvN0gL0d14zhSIIdYqAPpFd4f+rVxtuFgKORi8Sb7/TbHj6cVjWQ KfZUqQhDR67JyALTghHmJ5UTu1Hq5LEQe90qgoeXBExXBp12yCarF4HMbRTo6W4fMgAV k7zA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZhhIgGv6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i18si12451371ejp.271.2021.02.02.04.07.48; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 04:08:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZhhIgGv6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229554AbhBBMG3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 07:06:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53148 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229466AbhBBMGZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 07:06:25 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD18C0613D6; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 04:05:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id h7so27569612lfc.6; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 04:05:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZJZa8ktkwaZW4AbOUUEv4pH4i7/84OjW4Q1Eqgk5LoI=; b=ZhhIgGv6kFoKOstjqEJGPpgOjltNOU0Q20L6WCG9gmtO2/1ela3UqpssKXu81dZjv6 4Cm9xq/oOT+IBT6Pq6hMgkZK+mW4yAu24xWp0tbw279BfmpTJkbKsoRK/kXnCEQ9KjYF 7b8UkEtxMJCZ82g3lu+J01ZYMhWXdbHyExo0TzU+bWcLmUea5c1GpUlB2DSzQpTmGT7G BIXMn2xxZBDDkZn7Ed3rFLg7jYNfe3YfSOt+1BAUVQoIeQuX2rRpspWR8xFleZ4kASfZ HtzkEwNoQUECe9x99AhSiljyYWEmpLrVhZpI0BITBdcUXVRQHAIRBuxTuBBmDlRWLZYg z8hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZJZa8ktkwaZW4AbOUUEv4pH4i7/84OjW4Q1Eqgk5LoI=; b=KBdR/NRPJRz1ccjQWSY8HPZkKd0JRICbfCti1aAJO1hnAFLXIQOOSWWrGaIrZmc9V5 +M6wMwebPQ3ue9dO1HWh2KH8XEIR+2acSPtPkZhfYEyN1ybuhO81D94PxRPETcRjkw/q ViqWBZjSsE+Lq/hWlMqT+1TDtY79ZA/TUjuzlu4Wl6PmPJi6XVMuPwKdZ4PIcy1iZ+Z0 Gmn2qHoc78Q0Yh+PNX8lk93bs1UKoD31OTMQ6S79AX+ne/Z+RNUOG/KejHG1urFRhFEA bFjS2ixT1dCjWT63vu3MjJR6swYPjoMNMPD0A5XPWnpS7c3Vy5Mr5WsS3aqloZzIo1E/ 575g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Dgbqcizm8VDlRNLYhDLt0Rde8ppN+Y+eIXMCURdaVO/BNLgbP M13rfNJVv8JV/tcnsm5OaUUbI4Auj68= X-Received: by 2002:a19:7f4d:: with SMTP id a74mr11053568lfd.618.1612267542360; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 04:05:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (88-114-221-222.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [88.114.221.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 127sm3287307lfm.155.2021.02.02.04.05.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Feb 2021 04:05:41 -0800 (PST) From: Topi Miettinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor To: Casey Schaufler , casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210126164108.1958-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com> <20210126164108.1958-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> Message-ID: <31ba0fe7-afdf-8f7d-e7a7-8f15d8c690a4@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:05:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210126164108.1958-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26.1.2021 18.40, Casey Schaufler wrote: > This patchset provides the changes required for > the AppArmor security module to stack safely with any other. In my test, when kernel command line has apparmor before selinux in lsm= entry, the boot is not successful with enforcing=1: systemd[1]: Failed to compute init label, ignoring. systemd[1]: Failed to set SELinux security context system_u:object_r:cgroup_t:s0 for /sys/fs/cgroup: Invalid argument systemd[1]: Failed to set SELinux security context system_u:object_r:pstore_t:s0 for /sys/fs/pstore: Invalid argument systemd[1]: Failed to set SELinux security context system_u:object_r:sysfs_t:s0 for /sys/firmware/efi/efivars: Invalid argument ... Failed to drop capability bounding set of usermode helpers: Operation not permitted Failed to drop capability bounding set of usermode helpers. systemd[1]: Freezing execution. Probably SELinux libraries can't find or set the labels for the PID1 or any file systems. Before the init label message, systemd calls getcon_raw(), getfilecon_raw(), string_to_security_class() and security_compute_create_raw(), so one of these don't understand the LSM stacking. Also the policy needs updating to handle process2:setdisplay: SELinux: Permission setdisplay in class process2 not defined in policy. SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied With enforcing=0, many services start, but for example systemd-journald doesn't. This is probably related to the earlier problem with labels (maybe libraries try to use SELinux labels where kernel wants AppArmor profiles): systemd[1]: Failed to set SELinux security context system_u:object_r:init_runtime_t:s0 for /run/systemd/units/invocation:systemd-user-sessions.service: Invalid argument Switching the order so that apparmor is after selinux, boot is successful. Loading AppArmor profiles needs a permission from SELinux: Feb 02 08:53:15 audit[963]: AVC avc: denied { mac_admin } for pid=963 comm="apparmor_parser" capability=33 scontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 tclass=capability2 permissive=0 Feb 02 08:53:15 audit[963]: AVC apparmor="STATUS" operation="profile_replace" info="not policy admin" error=-13 profile="unconfined" pid=963 comm="apparmor_parser" Feb 02 08:53:15 audit: AUDIT1420 subj_selinux=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 subj_apparmor==unconfined Feb 02 08:53:15 audit[963]: SYSCALL arch=c000003e syscall=1 success=no exit=-13 a0=7 a1=7a8f2ff04f80 a2=1e09 a3=0 items=0 ppid=961 pid=963 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="apparmor_parser" exe="/usr/sbin/apparmor_parser" subj=? key=(null) Feb 02 08:53:15 audit: PROCTITLE proctitle=2F7362696E2F61707061726D6F725F706172736572002D2D77726974652D6361636865002D2D7265706C616365002D2D002F6574632F61707061726D6F722E64 Feb 02 08:53:15 apparmor.systemd[963]: /sbin/apparmor_parser: Unable to replace "/lib/systemd/systemd-resolved". Permission denied; attempted to load a profile while confined? This just seems to need TE rules for the apparmor_parser. Double equal sign in subj_apparmor==unconfined looks odd, should that be just one like subj_selinux? Tools like ps, and KDE and Gnome System Monitors only show SELinux context, but it would be nice if MAC contexts for all enabled LSMs were shown. -Topi > > v24: Rebase to 5.11-rc1 > Incorporate feedback from v23 > - Address the IMA team's concerns about "label collisions". > A label collision occurs when there is ambiguity about > which of multiple LSMs is being targeted in the definition > of an integrity check rule. A system with Smack and > AppArmor would be unable to distinguish which LSM is > important to an integrity rule referrencing the label > "unconfined" as that label is meaningful to both. > Provide a boot option to specify which LSM will be used in > IMA rules when multiple LSMs are present. (patch 04) > Pull LSM "slot" identification from later audit patches in > in support of this (patch 03). > - Pick up a few audit events that need to include supplimental > subject context records that had been missed in the > previous version. > v23: Rebase to 5.10-rc4 > Incorporate feedback from v22 > - Change /proc/*/attr/display to /proc/*/attr/interface_lsm to > make the purpose clearer. (patch 0012) > - Include ABI documentation. (patch 0012, 0022) > - Introduce LSM documentation updates with the patches where > the interfaces are added rather than at the end. (patch 0012, 0022) > Include more maintainers and mail lists in To: and Cc: directives. > v22: Rebase to 5.10-rc1 > v21: Rebase to 5.9-rc4 > Incorporate feedback from v20 > - Further revert UDS SO_PEERSEC to use scaffolding around > the interfaces that use lsmblobs and store only a single > secid. The possibility of multiple security modules > requiring data here is still a future problem. > - Incorporate Richard Guy Briggs' non-syscall auxiliary > records patch (patch 0019-0021) in place of my "supplimental" > records implementation. [I'm not sure I've given proper > attestation. I will correct as appropriate] > v20: Rebase to 5.9-rc1 > Change the BPF security module to use the lsmblob data. (patch 0002) > Repair length logic in subject label processing (patch 0015) > Handle -EINVAL from the empty BPF setprocattr hook (patch 0020) > Correct length processing in append_ctx() (patch 0022) > v19: Rebase to 5.8-rc6 > Incorporate feedback from v18 > - Revert UDS SO_PEERSEC implementation to use lsmblobs > directly, rather than allocating as needed. The correct > treatment of out-of-memory conditions in the later case > is difficult to define. (patch 0005) > - Use a size_t in append_ctx() (patch 0021) > - Fix a memory leak when creating compound contexts. (patch 0021) > Fix build error when CONFIG_SECURITY isn't set (patch 0013) > Fix build error when CONFIG_SECURITY isn't set (patch 0020) > Fix build error when CONFIG_SECURITY isn't set (patch 0021) > v18: Rebase to 5.8-rc3 > Incorporate feedback from v17 > - Null pointer checking in UDS (patch 0005) > Match changes in IMA code (patch 0012) > Fix the behavior of LSM context supplimental audit > records so that there's always exactly one when it's > appropriate for there to be one. This is a substantial > change that requires extention of the audit_context beyond > syscall events. (patch 0020) > v17: Rebase to 5.7-rc4 > v16: Rebase to 5.6 > Incorporate feedback from v15 - Thanks Stephen, Mimi and Paul > - Generally improve commit messages WRT scaffolding > - Comment ima_lsm_isset() (patch 0002) > - Some question may remain on IMA warning (patch 0002) > - Mark lsm_slot as __lsm_ro_after_init not __init_data (patch 0002) > - Change name of lsmblob variable in ima_match_rules() (patch 0003) > - Instead of putting a struct lsmblob into the unix_skb_parms > structure put a pointer to an allocated instance. There is > currently only space for 5 u32's in unix_skb_parms and it is > likely to get even tighter. Fortunately, the lifecycle > management of the allocated lsmblob is simple. (patch 0005) > - Dropped Acks due to the above change (patch 0005) > - Improved commentary on secmark labeling scaffolding. (patch 0006) > - Reduced secmark related labeling scaffolding. (patch 0006) > - Replace use of the zeroth entry of an lsmblob in scaffolding > with a function lsmblob_value() to hopefully make it less > obscure. (patch 0006) > - Convert security_secmark_relabel_packet to use lsmblob as > this reduces much of the most contentious scaffolding. (patch 0006) > - Dropped Acks due to the above change (patch 0006) > - Added BUILD_BUG_ON() for CIPSO tag 6. (patch 0018) > - Reworked audit subject information. Instead of adding fields in > the middle of existing records add a new record to the event. When > a separate record is required use subj="?". (patch 0020) > - Dropped Acks due to the above change (patch 0020) > - Reworked audit object information. Instead of adding fields in > the middle of existing records add a new record to the event. When > a separate record is required use obj="?". (patch 0021) > - Dropped Acks due to the above change (patch 0021) > - Enhanced documentation (patch 0022) > - Removed unnecessary error code check in security_getprocattr() > (patch 0021) > v15: Rebase to 5.6-rc1 > - Revise IMA data use (patch 0002) > Incorporate feedback from v14 > - Fix lockdown module registration naming (patch 0002) > - Revise how /proc/self/attr/context is gathered. (patch 0022) > - Revise access modes on /proc/self/attr/context. (patch 0022) > - Revise documentation on LSM external interfaces. (patch 0022) > v14: Rebase to 5.5-rc5 > Incorporate feedback from v13 > - Use an array of audit rules (patch 0002) > - Significant change, removed Acks (patch 0002) > - Remove unneeded include (patch 0013) > - Use context.len correctly (patch 0015) > - Reorder code to be more sensible (patch 0016) > - Drop SO_PEERCONTEXT as it's not needed yet (patch 0023) > v13: Rebase to 5.5-rc2 > Incorporate feedback from v12 > - Print lsmblob size with %z (Patch 0002) > - Convert lockdown LSM initialization. (Patch 0002) > - Restore error check in nft_secmark_compute_secid (Patch 0006) > - Correct blob scaffolding in ima_must_appraise() (Patch 0009) > - Make security_setprocattr() clearer (Patch 0013) > - Use lsm_task_display more widely (Patch 0013) > - Use passed size in lsmcontext_init() (Patch 0014) > - Don't add a smack_release_secctx() hook (Patch 0014) > - Don't print warning in security_release_secctx() (Patch 0014) > - Don't duplicate the label in nfs4_label_init_security() (Patch 0016) > - Remove reviewed-by as code has significant change (Patch 0016) > - Send the entire lsmblob for Tag 6 (Patch 0019) > - Fix description of socket_getpeersec_stream parameters (Patch 0023) > - Retain LSMBLOB_FIRST. What was I thinking? (Patch 0023) > - Add compound context to LSM documentation (Patch 0023) > v12: Rebase to 5.5-rc1 > Fixed a couple of incorrect contractions in the text. > v11: Rebase to 5.4-rc6 > Incorporate feedback from v10 > - Disambiguate reading /proc/.../attr/display by restricting > all use of the interface to the current process. > - Fix a merge error in AppArmor's display attribute check > v10: Ask the security modules if the display can be changed. > v9: There is no version 9 > v8: Incorporate feedback from v7 > - Minor clean-up in display value management > - refactor "compound" context creation to use a common > append_ctx() function. > v7: Incorporate feedback from v6 > - Make setting the display a privileged operation. The > availability of compound contexts reduces the need for > setting the display. > v6: Incorporate feedback from v5 > - Add subj_= and obj_= fields to audit records > - Add /proc/.../attr/context to get the full context in > lsmname\0value\0... format as suggested by Simon McVittie > - Add SO_PEERCONTEXT for getsockopt() to get the full context > in the same format, also suggested by Simon McVittie. > - Add /sys/kernel/security/lsm_display_default to provide > the display default value. > v5: Incorporate feedback from v4 > - Initialize the lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx() > - Clear the lsmcontext in all security_release_secctx() cases > - Don't use the "display" on strictly internal context > interfaces. > - The SELinux binder hooks check for cases where the context > "display" isn't compatible with SELinux. > v4: Incorporate feedback from v3 > - Mark new lsm__alloc functions static > - Replace the lsm and slot fields of the security_hook_list > with a pointer to a LSM allocated lsm_id structure. The > LSM identifies if it needs a slot explicitly. Use the > lsm_id rather than make security_add_hooks return the > slot value. > - Validate slot values used in security.c > - Reworked the "display" process attribute handling so that > it works right and doesn't use goofy list processing. > - fix display value check in dentry_init_security > - Replace audit_log of secids with '?' instead of deleting > the audit log > v3: Incorporate feedback from v2 > - Make lsmblob parameter and variable names more > meaningful, changing "le" and "l" to "blob". > - Improve consistency of constant naming. > - Do more sanity checking during LSM initialization. > - Be a bit clearer about what is temporary scaffolding. > - Rather than clutter security_getpeersec_dgram with > otherwise unnecessary checks remove the apparmor > stub, which does nothing useful. > > Patch 01 moves management of the sock security blob > from the individual modules to the infrastructure. > > Patches 02-03 introduce a structure "lsmblob" that will gradually > replace the "secid" as a shorthand for security module information. > At this point lsmblob contains an array of u32 secids, one "slot" > for each of the security modules compiled into the kernel that > used secids. A "slot" is allocated when a security module requests > one. > > Patch 04 provides mechanism for the IMA subsystem to identify > explicitly which LSM is subject to IMA policy. This includes > a boot option for specifying the default and an additional option > in IMA rules "lsm=". > > Patches 05-13 change LSM interfaces to use the lsmblob instead > of secids. It is important that the lsmblob be a fixed size entity > that does not have to be allocated. Several of the places > where it is used would have performance and/or locking > issues with dynamic allocation. > > Patch 14 provides a mechanism for a process to identify which > security module's hooks should be used when displaying or > converting a security context string. A new interface > /proc/self/attr/interface_lsm contains the name of the security > module to show. Reading from this file will present the name of > the module, while writing to it will set the value. Only names > of active security modules are accepted. Internally, the name > is translated to the appropriate "slot" number for the module > which is then stored in the task security blob. Setting the > display requires that all modules using the /proc interfaces > allow the transition. The interface LSM of other processess > can be neither read nor written. All suggested cases for > reading the interface LSM of a different process have race > conditions. > > Patch 15 Starts the process of changing how a security > context is represented. Since it is possible for a > security context to have been generated by more than one > security module it is now necessary to note which module > created a security context so that the correct "release" > hook can be called. There are several places where the > module that created a security context cannot be inferred. > > This is achieved by introducing a "lsmcontext" structure > which contains the context string, its length and the > "slot" number of the security module that created it. > The security_release_secctx() interface is changed, > replacing the (string,len) pointer pair with a lsmcontext > pointer. > > Patches 16-18 convert the security interfaces from > (string,len) pointer pairs to a lsmcontext pointer. > The slot number identifying the creating module is > added by the infrastructure. Where the security context > is stored for extended periods the data type is changed. > > The Netlabel code is converted to save lsmblob structures > instead of secids in Patch 19. This is not strictly > necessary as there can only be one security module that > uses Netlabel at this point. Using a lsmblob is much > cleaner, as the interfaces that use the data have all > been converted. > > Patch 20 adds checks to the binder hooks which verify > that both ends of a transaction use the same interface LSM. > > Patches 21-23 add addition audit records for subject and > object LSM data when there are multiple security modules > with such data. The AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record is used > in conjuction with a "subj=?" field to identify the subject > data. The AUDIT_MAC_OBJ_CONTEXTS record is used in conjuction > with a "obj=?" field to identify the object data. The > AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record identifies the security module > with the data: "subj_selinux=xyz_t subj_apparmor=abc". The > AUDIT_MAC_OBJ_CONTEXTS record identifies the security module > with the data: "obj_selinux=xyz_t obj_apparmor=abc". While > AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS records will always contain an entry > for each possible security modules, AUDIT_MAC_OBJ_CONTEXTS > records will only contain entries for security modules for > which the object in question has data. > > An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is: > > type=UNKNOWN[1420] > msg=audit(1600880931.832:113) > subj_apparmor==unconfined > subj_smack=_ > > An example of the MAC_OBJ_CONTEXTS (1421) record is: > > type=UNKNOWN[1421] > msg=audit(1601152467.009:1050): > obj_selinux=unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 > > Patch 24 adds a new interface for getting the compound security > contexts, /proc/self/attr/context. An example of the content > of this file is: > > selinux\0one_u:one_r:one_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023\0apparmor\0unconfined\0 > > Finally, with all interference on the AppArmor hooks removed, > Patch 25 removes the exclusive bit from AppArmor. An unnecessary > stub hook was also removed. > > The Ubuntu project is using an earlier version of this patchset in > their distribution to enable stacking for containers. > > Performance measurements to date have the change within the "noise". > The sockperf and dbench results are on the order of 0.2% to 0.8% > difference, with better performance being as common as worse. The > benchmarks were run with AppArmor and Smack on Ubuntu. > > https://github.com/cschaufler/lsm-stacking.git#stack-5.11-rc1-v24 > > Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler > > > Casey Schaufler (25): > LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security > LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure. > LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings > IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs > LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match > LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as > LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid > LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx > LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid > LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid > LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid > LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid > IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs > LSM: Specify which LSM to display > LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser > LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx > LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx > LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter > NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob > LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder > audit: add support for non-syscall auxiliary records > Audit: Add new record for multiple process LSM attributes > Audit: Add a new record for multiple object LSM attributes > LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context > AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag > > Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 8 +- > Documentation/ABI/testing/procfs-attr-context | 14 + > .../ABI/testing/procfs-attr-lsm_display | 22 + > Documentation/security/lsm.rst | 28 + > drivers/android/binder.c | 26 +- > fs/ceph/xattr.c | 6 +- > fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 8 +- > fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 20 +- > fs/proc/base.c | 2 + > include/linux/audit.h | 43 +- > include/linux/cred.h | 3 +- > include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 36 +- > include/linux/security.h | 185 +++++- > include/net/netlabel.h | 11 +- > include/net/scm.h | 15 +- > include/net/xfrm.h | 13 +- > include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 + > kernel/audit.c | 175 ++++-- > kernel/audit.h | 11 +- > kernel/auditfilter.c | 36 +- > kernel/auditsc.c | 191 +++--- > kernel/cred.c | 12 +- > net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c | 26 +- > net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 12 +- > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 24 +- > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 11 +- > net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 38 +- > net/netfilter/nft_meta.c | 10 +- > net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c | 7 +- > net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c | 4 +- > net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 6 +- > net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 106 ++-- > net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.h | 2 +- > net/netlabel/netlabel_user.c | 23 +- > net/netlabel/netlabel_user.h | 2 +- > net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 10 +- > net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 20 +- > security/apparmor/include/apparmor.h | 3 +- > security/apparmor/include/net.h | 6 +- > security/apparmor/include/procattr.h | 2 +- > security/apparmor/lsm.c | 105 ++-- > security/apparmor/procattr.c | 22 +- > security/bpf/hooks.c | 12 +- > security/commoncap.c | 7 +- > security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 15 +- > security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 17 +- > security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 6 +- > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 54 +- > security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 97 ++- > security/integrity/integrity_audit.c | 6 +- > security/loadpin/loadpin.c | 8 +- > security/lockdown/lockdown.c | 7 +- > security/safesetid/lsm.c | 8 +- > security/security.c | 561 ++++++++++++++++-- > security/selinux/hooks.c | 99 ++-- > security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 2 +- > security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 5 + > security/selinux/include/security.h | 1 + > security/selinux/netlabel.c | 25 +- > security/selinux/ss/services.c | 4 +- > security/smack/smack.h | 6 + > security/smack/smack_access.c | 2 +- > security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 91 +-- > security/smack/smack_netfilter.c | 8 +- > security/smack/smackfs.c | 13 +- > security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c | 8 +- > security/yama/yama_lsm.c | 7 +- > 67 files changed, 1741 insertions(+), 634 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/procfs-attr-context > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/procfs-attr-lsm_display >