Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751578AbWITOwY (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:52:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751581AbWITOwX (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:52:23 -0400 Received: from aun.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.36]:64459 "EHLO aun.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751577AbWITOwX (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:52:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:51:41 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: <200609201451.k8KEpfM4014377@alkaid.it.uu.se> From: Mikael Pettersson To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, w@1wt.eu Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre3 Cc: davem@davemloft.net, mikpe@it.uu.se, mtosatti@redhat.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 914 Lines: 19 On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:32:53 +0000, Willy Tarreau wrote: >I've been a little bit silent and quite busy too. As announced with -pre2, >here comes -pre3 with only GCC4 fixes. Other fixes I received are minor >and can wait for -pre4. I really want people to test -pre3 without adding >any noise to the test. There should be *no* regression at all with existing >compilers. I've reviewed the changes and they look fine. So far 2.4.34-pre3 compiled with gcc-4.1.1 runs on i386, x86_64, and ppc32 without any regressions. I'll test 2.4.34-pre3 on sparc64 this weekend, but since 2.4.34-pre2 + my gcc4 fixes already runs fine on sparc64, I don't expect any problems. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/