Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:41:27 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc:     Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>,
        Sheng Xu <sheng.xu@unisoc.com>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: add Unisoc iommu basic driver
Message-ID: <20210202144126.GC32671@8bytes.org>
References: <20210202073258.559443-3-zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
 <20210202104257.736836-1-zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
 <20210202140101.GA32671@8bytes.org>
 <992fad43-c457-d809-3bd7-7fd5b6e8fa22@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <992fad43-c457-d809-3bd7-7fd5b6e8fa22@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 02:34:34PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Nope, I believe if Arm Ltd. had any involvement in this I'd know about it :)

Okay, got confused by thinking of ARM as the CPU architecture, not the
company :)
But given the intel/ and amd/ subdirectories refer to company names as
well, the same is true for arm/.

Regards,

	Joerg