Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210122204038.3238-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <20210122204038.3238-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz>
 <YA6YEK4/rjtPLdkG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1611652167.11983.65.camel@suse.cz>
 <20210126093140.GB3592@techsingularity.net> <YA/pYrvvjf8AxPEv@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <1611933781.15858.48.camel@suse.cz> <1612275425.27785.70.camel@suse.cz> <YBmYFnZuezAIlEhw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
In-Reply-To: <YBmYFnZuezAIlEhw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:29:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gnu1DjPKEDWAf_hHku61rBdHfEL0pon+t-NwZXPzSEOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86,sched: On AMD EPYC set freq_max = max_boost in
 schedutil invariant formula
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Jon Grimm <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>,
        Nathan Fontenot <Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>,
        Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
        Suthikulpanit Suravee <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
        Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Michael Larabel <Michael@phoronix.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:17:05PM +0100, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote:
> > Hello Rafael,
> >
> > you haven't replied to this patch, which was written aiming at v5.11.
>
> I've tentatively queued this for x86/urgent, but ideally this goes
> through a cpufreq tree. Rafael, Viresh?

I've missed it, sorry.

I can queue it up tomorrow if all goes well.

Cheers!