Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp723187pxb; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:44:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7PtggAFRONiql6m8SA25O0N1mHWdV8meylgCqoKaqQR3Wqcmf390mJgv/iPBrzQkiIiVU X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d489:: with SMTP id b9mr638752edr.374.1612313069203; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:44:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612313069; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OclKv7xAq9CDGhEA5NnkHuwYGP5IEr4PEjWwhDzhEDUJJHgDAEKmwbP6O7ORk3wE8n WJVegN/S5pWAU2nIWZ4WMB1puC1RBoh19eAK2ynKnLVsLY/yPh/GS6VfcUD+Q23EebzH 6M6GAKRBTYyUdKG9vazcxtb+xwxom1Y5ST5WebDOplLfLTn2XvolGpZVv4vCSYtsvOsm cfg4H9m6edU+AXOsWXr2EcIQk8Pw9MombTNgWhHR14kUW23NPj8jOTcQo/RpFgvlidcJ YQ1JJYkxU44L4PnN7Y6WUXNkYpvtpjTdZVs1Xzh/3kdZJAPlBub2oL5QDbsG8AHxvK96 fH+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=QYQBueHzqrf3c7uzh6S2F+D3jH2y4BvQodyiEtpeFtE=; b=gntZrlmfOzqQRg5WTT0Op9HE9M0CD0Vt6jn+yTpb8H5HQohjNbNbgQpL4mVJ0FTJdT c/E0sHEC0jzSid3QW8onmUpvhIr8cX+y5RM17bAhkWA8LC2dAe0vlQBlf9PyKUkzok63 NZFx8mknB05zcCk/PGbkt+FtcHSCwtpUFAclu3WUszn2It45lpQiwyvNqEYJHiXhs/iA oX0hw4JraHdsGP+7kljiJom0WyxCc1O05Dyt2iGebbbI22EgBXp0x4MMLIjpZud0p+Zy lFW3bO6+ieNozwr/aZykuR18vP+GNs4p4ecY5Kby/1fFejq6ijNNKfVp6BxLj1diU1rP MfAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n24si287165ejx.149.2021.02.02.16.44.04; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:44:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239407AbhBBTDI (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:03:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f50.google.com ([209.85.210.50]:39212 "EHLO mail-ot1-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239310AbhBBTAa (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:00:30 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f50.google.com with SMTP id i30so20906276ota.6; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:00:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QYQBueHzqrf3c7uzh6S2F+D3jH2y4BvQodyiEtpeFtE=; b=FQCLpgQ/4zSovBSuwL9wnLoSD6BVDYJcsc1lnCXYL9iUjqwtNhSn6VVk/i9J7FmMCK sNv3+LqWWW0Q21OhH34oDe798S8RyAdwHiD1qAkU9ZEVGrO4diK4+c/JY1jJxqo+khfW TD5T1CwfnAtCHxdtKSTMLqdnZALCHQam9bSv2HststFjRWry0xdVtPkG8ZS96usT3/5p IA60Y8IwM8ovtGcC9tuo1qt5JqlAm9lmYxNGS+JEm1/OZfVgFg14Ba1K6i6Ur8E51P9s ep9QZssdEbDXRx2togjfzyiFUinGdHgNHf1Llf6axyICysgBD7Hrfg9jiOrVOYuY+n+0 KRYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eFVi/8jE+Sp0WW6i9c0Ip42G76eilK6iI06Y+AozbX6wsr3TK ginJJ4gYkx6Ta1E16yqfPkBa0DiLyYjV8DuAWQE= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7a4a:: with SMTP id z10mr16973295otm.206.1612292388810; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:59:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210122204038.3238-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <20210122204038.3238-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20210122204038.3238-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:59:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86,sched: On AMD EPYC set freq_max = max_boost in schedutil invariant formula To: Giovanni Gherdovich Cc: Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Jon Grimm , Nathan Fontenot , Yazen Ghannam , Thomas Lendacky , Suthikulpanit Suravee , Mel Gorman , Pu Wen , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Michael Larabel , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:47 PM Giovanni Gherdovich wrote: > [cut] > > Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems") > Fixes: 976df7e5730e ("x86, sched: Use midpoint of max_boost and max_P for frequency invariance on AMD EPYC") > Reported-by: Michael Larabel > Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich > --- > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 ++ > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 +++ > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 8 +++- > 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > index 1e4fbb002a31..2378bc1bf2c4 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ > > #include > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB Why is the #ifdef needed here? > +#include > +#endif > + > #include > #include > #include > @@ -628,11 +632,57 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_blacklist(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > } > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB > +static bool amd_max_boost(unsigned int max_freq, > + unsigned int *max_boost) > +{ > + struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps; > + u64 highest_perf, nominal_perf, perf_ratio; > + int ret; > + > + ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(0, &perf_caps); > + if (ret) { > + pr_debug("Could not retrieve perf counters (%d)\n", ret); > + return false; > + } > + > + highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; > + nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf; > + > + if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) { > + pr_debug("Could not retrieve highest or nominal performance\n"); > + return false; > + } > + > + perf_ratio = div_u64(highest_perf * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, nominal_perf); > + if (perf_ratio <= SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) { > + pr_debug("Either perf_ratio is 0, or nominal >= highest performance\n"); > + return false; > + } > + > + *max_boost = max_freq * perf_ratio >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; > + if (!*max_boost) { > + pr_debug("max_boost seems to be zero\n"); > + return false; > + } > + > + return true; > +} > +#else > +static bool amd_max_boost(unsigned int max_freq, > + unsigned int *max_boost) > +{ > + return false; > +} > +#endif > + > static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > unsigned int i; > unsigned int valid_states = 0; > unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; > + unsigned int freq, max_freq = 0; > + unsigned int max_boost; > struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data; > unsigned int result = 0; > struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(policy->cpu); > @@ -779,15 +829,25 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > freq_table[valid_states-1].frequency / 1000) > continue; > > + freq = perf->states[i].core_frequency * 1000; > freq_table[valid_states].driver_data = i; > - freq_table[valid_states].frequency = > - perf->states[i].core_frequency * 1000; > + freq_table[valid_states].frequency = freq; > + > + if (freq > max_freq) > + max_freq = freq; > + > valid_states++; > } > freq_table[valid_states].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; > policy->freq_table = freq_table; > perf->state = 0; > > + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD && > + amd_max_boost(max_freq, &max_boost)) { > + policy->cpuinfo.max_boost = max_boost; Why not to set max_freq to max_boost instead? This value is set once at the init time anyway and schedutil would use max_boost instead of max_freq anyway. Also notice that the static branch is global and the max_boost value for different CPUs may be different, at least in theory. > + static_branch_enable(&cpufreq_amd_max_boost); > + } > + > switch (perf->control_register.space_id) { > case ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO: > /* > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index d0a3525ce27f..b96677f6b57e 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -2721,6 +2721,9 @@ int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled); > > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpufreq_amd_max_boost); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_amd_max_boost); > + > /********************************************************************* > * REGISTER / UNREGISTER CPUFREQ DRIVER * > *********************************************************************/ > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > index 9c8b7437b6cd..341cac76d254 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > @@ -40,9 +40,14 @@ enum cpufreq_table_sorting { > CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_DESCENDING > }; > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpufreq_amd_max_boost); > + > +#define cpufreq_driver_has_max_boost() static_branch_unlikely(&cpufreq_amd_max_boost) > + > struct cpufreq_cpuinfo { > unsigned int max_freq; > unsigned int min_freq; > + unsigned int max_boost; > > /* in 10^(-9) s = nanoseconds */ > unsigned int transition_latency; > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > index 6931f0cdeb80..541f3db3f576 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, > unsigned long util, unsigned long max) > { > struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy; > - unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ? > - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq : policy->cur; > + unsigned int freq, max_freq; > + > + max_freq = cpufreq_driver_has_max_boost() ? > + policy->cpuinfo.max_boost : policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > + > + freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ? max_freq : policy->cur; > > freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max); > > -- > 2.26.2 >