Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932169AbWITRvT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:51:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932171AbWITRvT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:51:19 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.12]:23745 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932169AbWITRvT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:51:19 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references: content-type:organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=t0sMScOMlZdRGhHbVF5kMl/urr5KwQnr92RWJwpafcmTbv6Kzart5OpiKN1V6TFgN iQxxvwtvTNX5etEnT7NFA== Subject: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction From: Rohit Seth Reply-To: rohitseth@google.com To: Nick Piggin Cc: Peter Zijlstra , CKRM-Tech , devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel , Linux Memory Management , Christoph Lameter In-Reply-To: <451173B5.1000805@yahoo.com.au> References: <1158718568.29000.44.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <4510D3F4.1040009@yahoo.com.au> <1158751720.8970.67.camel@twins> <4511626B.9000106@yahoo.com.au> <1158767787.3278.103.camel@taijtu> <451173B5.1000805@yahoo.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Google Inc Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:50:57 -0700 Message-Id: <1158774657.8574.65.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 996 Lines: 29 On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 03:00 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > (this time to the lists as well) > > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > I'd much rather containterize the whole reclaim code, which should not > > be too hard since he already adds a container pointer to struct page. > > Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code. > > I still have to reread what Rohit does for file backed pages, that gave > > my head a spin. Please let me know if there is any specific part that isn't making much sense. -rohit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/