Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932336AbWITTzi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:55:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932343AbWITTzi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:55:38 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:18341 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932336AbWITTzh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:55:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:55:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Chandra Seetharaman cc: Paul Menage , npiggin@suse.de, CKRM-Tech , linux-kernel , pj@sgi.com, Rohit Seth , devel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction In-Reply-To: <1158778496.6536.95.camel@linuxchandra> Message-ID: References: <1158718568.29000.44.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158777240.6536.89.camel@linuxchandra> <6599ad830609201143h19f6883wb388666e27913308@mail.google.com> <1158778496.6536.95.camel@linuxchandra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 660 Lines: 16 On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > We had this discussion more than 18 months back and concluded that it is > not the right thing to do. Here is the link to the thread: Recent discussions on linux-mm sounded very different. I also brought this up at the VM summit. Could you have a look at cpusets and the discussion on linux-mm and then think how this could be done in a less VM invasive way? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/