Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp172603pxb; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 02:38:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6IiPvvgKg6/O7YTg+uJ0k7gRRzg39xm5bcrdEIAIclbmhmw8A82zaxTFv9derSt54RA5M X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d401:: with SMTP id z1mr2248833edq.213.1612348720744; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 02:38:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612348720; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NCzDaW/NqbJexmA8MihUWH/X4Sjw3WQsEo7Mhrtye+VU1vwftVbCfGx/E/H+3e8pbL 2OJO/yu9jfBSIgIEEqM5DLitxUAVY3Abyg59L8GbbY6LxJ3/lXhyWIphrnYWrJIdUD7W VB6i03wqj208kqZ9lkg94lQCoGO5LkGwG4MtBtplgvRPaCVFaKb72OKxSIDODqbeyEqs bBV7R3FZ5oG/VUMRUTuKOzH5xXb188YAsOeJjzH6TFAXpXL2ED12obyecJeKfeOS3dZz dOWV870v1WVS55I3eybb13JyI2VVKe3bSMyzp2qL3FhLx1nqTZZd4U9EYXWiefgq2Y3E zoJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:dkim-signature; bh=k9RcrWqEMmIu4JJrx0dP6V+HBB+m20FBfTWZA+92L0E=; b=S2dwlIj9T02LuNdZPknrGQtZr3kZQACvZecBhX4U7OPRCXuaLfLJfeKFH/Qc1HlKQl ZUJAgnQFGndvg/4+W/QuD7vCOrZ8IvZBh6nmvpbSBTFwU3Uo1CVjldXqc0upLUMt5Zg3 mM8MYtFfcsYhd+s9wcEZ5pm2G7HA4nNEvR0AVciMoaHqh3SkviaoQ+eUfU1wbe7Abwj8 fyYHSTapvdj5Mlijwp9hoB/GOQ5c/TzPNGI794f+sCcbohVvxsTazoUbiF3ekGzXpgkt zwnEnZRfGJ4DDoHmu/ho/nqBKM4t67LQ2e1Vf1gi2k2UJawXTu08fWQPOXHyQk0mahX2 LUYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Gj1e0+JX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u5si1006760ejz.642.2021.02.03.02.38.15; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 02:38:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Gj1e0+JX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233819AbhBCKhL (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 05:37:11 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:27116 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233935AbhBCKhE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 05:37:04 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 113AXoWJ132330; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 05:36:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=k9RcrWqEMmIu4JJrx0dP6V+HBB+m20FBfTWZA+92L0E=; b=Gj1e0+JXBtXIt9TrlMbUjs+VNwmyEJpkvOjOOZhouOW7qRACOXpEKxu0n19nwsppV32P eV8nMGTKlwjBalCIOmEzBc+pkrzjRSJ3UKVUkpTQRZ7qv15o9kq7RYhWdG2mkUSCTOwn zERwYUsIK+k2pQbRzA2AAaK5ID5/ZzRw4cMjZoJMNMDdcGu8BbdYB8Oyii3LWpxGmlui 8Zp2tzo+QG5e2Xk+niGs1ro+hcLp51jOaK7TUIX1dL2MzVPzxzAxsaU3zDe4jID+jCZ4 N8OsIFvzon+WMEEBNsXBm6M8nQIrWdorcFXFx7GpzZoACjVOA1n6et4Ot7rFl75Z9Gcl Mw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36fs6hj3kk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 05:36:23 -0500 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 113AaNZH144730; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 05:36:23 -0500 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36fs6hj3j7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 05:36:22 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 113AWDhu003575; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:36:20 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36er8y9k5y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 10:36:20 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 113AaH4337159302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:36:17 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394164C04E; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:36:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90894C046; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:36:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ibm-vm (unknown [9.145.15.83]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:36:16 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:36:13 +0100 From: Claudio Imbrenda To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/kvm: VSIE: correctly handle MVPG when in VSIE Message-ID: <20210203113613.75274ae0@ibm-vm> In-Reply-To: <20210202180028.876888-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210202180028.876888-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> <20210202180028.876888-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369,18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-03_04:2021-02-03,2021-02-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102030061 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:00:28 +0100 Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > Correctly handle the MVPG instruction when issued by a VSIE guest. > > Fixes: a3508fbe9dc6d ("KVM: s390: vsie: initial support for nested > virtualization") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda > --- > arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 94 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 89 > insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c > index 7db022141db3..2db49749e27b 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c > @@ -416,11 +416,6 @@ static void unshadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct vsie_page *vsie_page) memcpy((void *)((u64)scb_o + 0xc0), > (void *)((u64)scb_s + 0xc0), 0xf0 - 0xc0); > break; > - case ICPT_PARTEXEC: > - /* MVPG only */ > - memcpy((void *)((u64)scb_o + 0xc0), > - (void *)((u64)scb_s + 0xc0), 0xd0 - 0xc0); > - break; > } > > if (scb_s->ihcpu != 0xffffU) > @@ -982,6 +977,91 @@ static int handle_stfle(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct vsie_page *vsie_page) return 0; > } > > +static u64 vsie_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page > *vsie_page, u8 reg) +{ > + reg &= 0xf; > + switch (reg) { > + case 15: > + return vsie_page->scb_s.gg15; > + case 14: > + return vsie_page->scb_s.gg14; > + default: > + return vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg]; > + } > +} > + > +static int vsie_handle_mvpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page > *vsie_page) +{ > + struct kvm_s390_sie_block *scb_s = &vsie_page->scb_s; > + unsigned long pei1, pei2, src, dest, mask = PAGE_MASK; > + u64 *pei_block = &vsie_page->scb_o->mcic; > + int edat, rc1, rc2; > + union ctlreg0 cr0; > + > + cr0.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0]; > + edat = cr0.edat && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8); > + if (psw_bits(scb_s->gpsw).eaba == PSW_BITS_AMODE_24BIT) > + mask = 0xfff000; > + else if (psw_bits(scb_s->gpsw).eaba == PSW_BITS_AMODE_31BIT) > + mask = 0x7ffff000; > + > + dest = vsie_get_register(vcpu, vsie_page, scb_s->ipb >> 16) > & mask; > + src = vsie_get_register(vcpu, vsie_page, scb_s->ipb >> 20) & > mask; + > + rc1 = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap, dest, > &pei1); > + rc2 = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap, src, > &pei2); > + /* > + * Either everything went well, or something non-critical > went wrong > + * e.g. beause of a race. In either case, simply retry. > + */ > + if (rc1 == -EAGAIN || rc2 == -EAGAIN || (!rc1 && !rc2)) { > + retry_vsie_icpt(vsie_page); > + return -EAGAIN; > + } > + /* Something more serious went wrong, propagate the error */ > + if (rc1 < 0) > + return rc1; > + if (rc2 < 0) > + return rc2; > + > + /* The only possible suppressing exception: just deliver it > */ > + if (rc1 == PGM_TRANSLATION_SPEC || rc2 == > PGM_TRANSLATION_SPEC) { > + clear_vsie_icpt(vsie_page); > + rc1 = kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, > PGM_TRANSLATION_SPEC); > + WARN_ON_ONCE(rc1); > + return 1; > + } > + > + /* > + * Forward the PEI intercept to the guest if it was a page > fault, or > + * also for segment and region table faults if EDAT applies. > + */ > + if (edat) { > + rc1 = rc1 == PGM_ASCE_TYPE ? rc1 : 0; > + rc2 = rc2 == PGM_ASCE_TYPE ? rc2 : 0; > + } I just noticed, this should actually be: if (edat) { rc1 = rc1 == PGM_ASCE_TYPE ? rc1 : 0; rc2 = rc2 == PGM_ASCE_TYPE ? rc2 : 0; } else { rc1 = rc1 != PGM_PAGE_TRANSLATION ? rc1 : 0; rc2 = rc2 != PGM_PAGE_TRANSLATION ? rc2 : 0; } I'll fix it in the next version > + if ((!rc1 || rc1 == PGM_PAGE_TRANSLATION) && (!rc2 || rc2 == > PGM_PAGE_TRANSLATION)) { > + pei_block[0] = pei1; > + pei_block[1] = pei2; > + return 1; > + } > + > + retry_vsie_icpt(vsie_page); > + > + /* > + * The host has edat, and the guest does not, or it was an > ASCE type > + * exception. The host needs to inject the appropriate DAT > interrupts > + * into the guest. > + */ > + if (rc1) > + return inject_fault(vcpu, rc1, dest, 1); > + if (rc2) > + return inject_fault(vcpu, rc2, src, 0); > + > + /* This should never be reached */ > + return 0; > +} > + > /* > * Run the vsie on a shadow scb and a shadow gmap, without any > further > * sanity checks, handling SIE faults. > @@ -1068,6 +1148,10 @@ static int do_vsie_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct vsie_page *vsie_page) if ((scb_s->ipa & 0xf000) != 0xf000) > scb_s->ipa += 0x1000; > break; > + case ICPT_PARTEXEC: > + if (scb_s->ipa == 0xb254) > + rc = vsie_handle_mvpg(vcpu, vsie_page); > + break; > } > return rc; > }