Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp364430pxb; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:20:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwM8O+dlpmxNYb3+1zLaCEC//PzepTtkW8dbpKNXQ4oZnB1kaTTBfOiqgCxrwvv7OaD2T0o X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4051:: with SMTP id y17mr1208070ejj.45.1612365619356; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:20:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612365619; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DD3sk7w11Tp9cEy7sczxS/BXNNZQcMb5X6vg4+ekMAFjIU/oCWFIgAkdGIz9kLL0aF OuaIcBrUooZiy29Cy5ZvSZ5iJv3U/4QF/vpzCy/IUtUSnnU0c7pq/bh0AMApGMlFNqgX EeGRcY4w1AjMWML04EXcok0DjXHxoITolUK+M2WNTSIk16vyc/lesLdlyr4EeDvUs2n+ +1gVZfqFDb6Md68elU+72X537uSCoIF/GMgQ6KnptuL27O9GMCeLXROcxcF7Dwy8paI7 81Cf2TnJS/rrp7s3n68UiAt27iNKhWH7s1qSGak2mvy3hG6ssEPjGDhTV43teH2JO0o9 pJcA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=4OnV7QgmwppY2B/7zUA6ukykbXdfegSLEtgecuKYk54=; b=GC5UFv76uVoiBt9Ky+XWVQpvBXQ4T3ruKkV3UxTDYK9Wq25O+p2A0jyNB6f2W3V6aK BYLYWvi32QKpBS9I8InWqAA46Z6bNjYAl/90gEuyJPbfRqc3sXSCvFODF3/jy6sjeQCz O+0sVcRgBBK3GejDqsfya8yo49Qsna5pzRqMKcvJ1svBa8vv2vUMRpWad7tCFtMwL47P l96jRVSE0Yzj4xNBCJinrlw3eeCnteenMxrWd0Tkj2/FsUKSB4Wkfq8KD/Qe/dCE2GSp HT38ImT6K+OE4vNQslDlfsX+Do/1hGapX66oQBdC3syr60FTipaMky4ttYhUmJi3lin3 GqPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d12si1617097ejb.358.2021.02.03.07.19.41; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234339AbhBCPSz (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:18:55 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:41922 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234397AbhBCPRK (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:17:10 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983081474; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:15:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107158-lin (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.78]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 462703F73B; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:15:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:15:46 +0000 From: Qais Yousef To: Valentin Schneider Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Quentin Perret , Pavan Kondeti , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] sched/fair: Make check_misfit_status() only compare dynamic capacities Message-ID: <20210203151546.rwkbdjxc2vgiodvx@e107158-lin> References: <20210128183141.28097-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210128183141.28097-6-valentin.schneider@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210128183141.28097-6-valentin.schneider@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/28/21 18:31, Valentin Schneider wrote: > check_misfit_status() checks for both capacity pressure & available CPUs > with higher capacity. Now that we have a sane(ish) capacity comparison > margin which is used throughout load-balance, this can be condensed into a > single check: > > capacity_greater(, ); > > This has the added benefit of returning false if the misfit task CPU's is > heavily pressured, but there are no better candidates for migration. > > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider > --- check_cpu_capacity() call looks redundant now, yes. Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef Thanks -- Qais Yousef > kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 0959a770ecc0..ef44474b8fbf 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -8254,14 +8254,12 @@ check_cpu_capacity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd) > > /* > * Check whether a rq has a misfit task and if it looks like we can actually > - * help that task: we can migrate the task to a CPU of higher capacity, or > - * the task's current CPU is heavily pressured. > + * help that task: we can migrate the task to a CPU of higher capacity. > */ > -static inline int check_misfit_status(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd) > +static inline int check_misfit_status(struct rq *rq) > { > return rq->misfit_task_load && > - (capacity_greater(rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity, rq->cpu_capacity_orig) || > - check_cpu_capacity(rq, sd)); > + capacity_greater(rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity, rq->cpu_capacity); > } > > /* > @@ -10238,7 +10236,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq) > * When ASYM_CPUCAPACITY; see if there's a higher capacity CPU > * to run the misfit task on. > */ > - if (check_misfit_status(rq, sd)) { > + if (check_misfit_status(rq)) { > flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK; > goto unlock; > } > -- > 2.27.0 >