Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp370965pxb; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:28:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWTve6Zhr0c9xaKjddT9kto6uo+6yYcjm/SDbteSy5Kvh+dqeyuh8+Wc+AjbZQk1GjIdHP X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c784:: with SMTP id n4mr3445344eds.332.1612366095301; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:28:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612366095; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LMJIYp+UFX52W2OOgC2oh0dl+ti0yJoAUt5IKx1L7b8Kxi6wg4ra0hqSwpFQqdEc4W ppXTvcY/8WBoE6MiJJj9mBXPdcFQiEKJaQk8EXv9Wp+tioIbQ4bR8FsT3baqXoqAt6b6 plzGaVNuJqn2OlWZxsXdfyp1xDHL1ecfK9ocGM5bsAUIAi7IJj8Nd7LBXifzreqnDKwQ tjBlGogHMvdlsKLVtnmp4Qb8amhJa+nXwWElL55t6kH/HKBgYS4+G+QZ4UZhgNFtnDdx /epYV10P2xaGgJvsTXqzi8K2vFY6cbS+hcf/oVuTxBMb7yUOP+dqJi3YXBOJfdAs+pfx RN2A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=b+OO0QGxJRxpJr8sMMpFu2qoMc9u5TBcGuWeR7oxI9E=; b=iKfMzkssL+09gybzfmme8x1smERQWkqH0pDwheSVj3FG6I1z+WRtCxlwphTZQAwOeW /8O81Y6tWW+rYgAE44e31w+UG7wSkGFbVpSnu2zeqRPA1+JKtSoTEgG35YGlfE00CNSY g5mcyRkbS7LzbcvhYFWcZ7stRCn+LmTvgNMfsIoZ6d2DnzM8B3yhzFuRYKQuL3DahabM D7emqtTJc9bPq0md1DqznZ5NzujNhT1RlXV9cbd2pgJAKI4D3qdO9egixlRf153mZgjI jvmAgELhV1CVoe+EdP7jL4qF3CFP5Lrl0e6R+nC07lGrKZIaSA9W8vjk7QIN1tkjvJyL /JhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=hlytZJ5m; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fi28si451962ejb.379.2021.02.03.07.27.49; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:28:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=hlytZJ5m; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234171AbhBCP1S (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:27:18 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:60960 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233491AbhBCP1P (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:27:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612365949; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=b+OO0QGxJRxpJr8sMMpFu2qoMc9u5TBcGuWeR7oxI9E=; b=hlytZJ5mRvFF+Jg/t2k7BZjAaEASgeQdN9AGYHmd3gCLiD8PDpDHcXoc/TsvhQ787eUgEI tPFKqtb2OOahFO8Z2iBo1vyxtBGlmmHBEowHaoKulojwQWWOojPLpCP2h4Wl9/DaH+9t9w bUNCU72Aj7GPAb+hwvgAJ0WgSoh4gfQ= Received: from mail-qv1-f71.google.com (mail-qv1-f71.google.com [209.85.219.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-585-J1NpUJCSPzmDcHiKnKnXqw-1; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 10:25:47 -0500 X-MC-Unique: J1NpUJCSPzmDcHiKnKnXqw-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f71.google.com with SMTP id n1so15278365qvi.4 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:25:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=b+OO0QGxJRxpJr8sMMpFu2qoMc9u5TBcGuWeR7oxI9E=; b=PmmZS+ADkhJ/irU1UflAIQy1ZyFT0PlJV4jhDe1MJd4kk+i1war7xTpcQJi91uUjOh 1UOPJLKTTdMrw5qwn0gq98B6A2GooQU4iiijJBXf8VkuYBHhYCtvG3j8lBkOMDxPBRtS ZD5cL+7bJktmlV6SquR/6werK+yVMKhJ0hWDIZXJVwIRR5qAM9kLETgslFFSj0/wXtiS j9UJfZjfl0uKUCnJVlGJIRFHdYxfwHAD0AP4Wy/u7tNmk83HMCldJtoGOGs6tmIKm6EA HxZX+nIfLSjXYr9SPLwma4LfI/fqq/C8Qng8hhcg5WRzq0KqIOpUfi7VgbaPCOlldTZT L95A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XFW80ityHNavzJUnsjpAZLOSN9/NE0HFOn1sXALpfEjNopV0b 9UOGVLxasocY0bg71voNeqAnrG9aReT0ycZ3+oRbyzssHeP0gi9qslOBjM5L7Du7BG+G1xgrJpM a3FqelHP9eTCq777VHvSVMWw0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:9c3:: with SMTP id y3mr2924146qky.327.1612365944733; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:25:44 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:9c3:: with SMTP id y3mr2924127qky.327.1612365944419; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:25:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from trix.remote.csb (075-142-250-213.res.spectrum.com. [75.142.250.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm478459qtp.49.2021.02.03.07.25.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:25:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] fpga: dfl: afu: harden port enable logic To: Russ Weight , mdf@kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: lgoncalv@redhat.com, yilun.xu@intel.com, hao.wu@intel.com, matthew.gerlach@intel.com References: <20210202230631.198950-1-russell.h.weight@intel.com> From: Tom Rix Message-ID: <15f90871-170c-3487-0f99-47cf54163bb7@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:25:41 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210202230631.198950-1-russell.h.weight@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ..snip.. On 2/2/21 3:06 PM, Russ Weight wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-afu.h b/drivers/fpga/dfl-afu.h > index 576e94960086..e5020e2b1f3d 100644 > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-afu.h > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-afu.h > @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ struct dfl_afu { > }; > > /* hold pdata->lock when call __afu_port_enable/disable */ > -void __afu_port_enable(struct platform_device *pdev); > +int __afu_port_enable(struct platform_device *pdev); > int __afu_port_disable(struct platform_device *pdev); > Should the '__' prefix be removed from __afu_port* ? This would make the function names consistent with the other decls Tom > void afu_mmio_region_init(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata);