Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932461AbWITXCh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:02:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932462AbWITXCh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:02:37 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:50116 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932461AbWITXCg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:02:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:02:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Paul Jackson cc: rohitseth@google.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, devel@openvz.org, npiggin@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction In-Reply-To: <20060920155815.33b03991.pj@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <1158718568.29000.44.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158773208.8574.53.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158775678.8574.81.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <20060920155815.33b03991.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 534 Lines: 13 On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Paul Jackson wrote: > the kernel. A useful memory containerization should (IMHO) allow for > both adding and removing such containers. How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a process is part of a container and the container is removed? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/