Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1611555637-7688-1-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org> <1611555637-7688-2-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
In-Reply-To: <1611555637-7688-2-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:36:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Vi4a-uUuEStPpOvzF+goNZ7W5zTBbMg3oqmWq9urObBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: qcom: rpmh: Add rpmh_write_sleep_and_wake() function
To:     Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>, Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
        Srinivas Rao L <lsrao@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 10:21 PM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Let RPMH clients call rpmh_write_sleep_and_wake() to immediately
> write cached sleep and wake data to the TCSes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> (no changes since v1)
> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
> index cbe6b96..725b8f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
> @@ -515,6 +515,22 @@ int rpmh_flush(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr)
>  }
>
>  /**
> + * rpmh_write_sleep_and_wake() - Writes the buffered wake and sleep sets
> + * to TCSes
> + *
> + * @dev: The device making the request
> + *
> + * Return:
> + * * 0          - Success
> + * * Error code - Otherwise
> + */
> +int rpmh_write_sleep_and_wake(const struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       return rpmh_flush(get_rpmh_ctrlr(dev));
> +}

This patch doesn't hold weight on its own.  Please squash with patch
#3.  Specifically any clients actually trying to call this function
will hit the problems that patch #3 fixes.  There's no reason to add
broken code first and then fix it with a later patch in the same
series.


-Doug