Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210203135321.12253-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <20210203135321.12253-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz>
 <CAJZ5v0g1SWRnV1QfZG3o+hvBg9akakhDMomGCFjwERyG2ENKww@mail.gmail.com>
 <5470319.60Xv9dOaFs@kreacher> <563fec57-6417-e875-1788-3773cbfb34be@phoronix.com>
In-Reply-To: <563fec57-6417-e875-1788-3773cbfb34be@phoronix.com>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:40:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jzhVJ-8iVfhkFHBdJf1pYAMtC=1JhuTn14vWtZUwJoAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86,sched: On AMD EPYC set freq_max = max_boost in
 schedutil invariant formula
To:     Michael Larabel <Michael@phoronix.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Jon Grimm <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>,
        Nathan Fontenot <Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>,
        Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
        Suthikulpanit Suravee <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:36 AM Michael Larabel <Michael@phoronix.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/21 12:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 3:11:37 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:53 PM Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz> wrote:
> >> [cut]
> >>
> >>> Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems")
> >>> Fixes: 976df7e5730e ("x86, sched: Use midpoint of max_boost and max_P for frequency invariance on AMD EPYC")
> >>> Reported-by: Michael Larabel <Michael@phoronix.com>
> >>> Tested-by: Michael Larabel <Michael@phoronix.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
> >>> ---
> >>>   drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c   | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >>>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c        |  3 ++
> >>>   include/linux/cpufreq.h          |  5 +++
> >>>   kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |  8 +++--
> >> I don't really think that it is necessary to modify schedutil to
> >> address this issue.
> > So below is a prototype of an alternative fix for the issue at hand.
> >
> > I can't really test it here, because there's no _CPC in the ACPI tables of my
> > test machines, so testing it would be appreciated.  However, AFAICS these
> > machines are affected by the performance issue related to the scale-invariance
> > when they are running acpi-cpufreq, so what we are doing here is not entirely
> > sufficient.
>
>
> I have benchmarks running on several Ryzen and EPYC systems with this
> patch. The full batch of tests won't be done until tomorrow, but in
> looking at the data so far from an AMD EPYC 7F72 2P server over the past
> few hours, this patch does provide fairly comparable numbers to
> Giovanni's patch. There were a few outliers so far but waiting to see
> with the complete set of results. At the very least it's clear enough
> already this new patch is at least an improvement over the current 5.11
> upstream state with schedutil on AMD.

Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated!

Let me submit the patch properly, then.