Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1500878pxb; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:58:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6bXAxN8sYJp95DNIIvVlJ+XZHijASPt4KXflEfK05xXNUh1hc2HiSp1aAsTbmi0u9XgHE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2851:: with SMTP id s17mr1303546ejc.510.1612479487623; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:58:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612479487; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VNESlCAiREar/EwcVhfeiPK4WLbfRXDFE8gL1DpyGRJ8RdKEpj1lUHmuQcqsqCob50 CWyufVSMMvuC4s4tDwOsUNQEjMWUrIdYl2IaeDxVFj/z3DtFI8yioon87XGSKYgTvK+k x84v4gymr4olO2TjhRn5S6SSVCK7ePotCVOQydzaR7oBD5EtBt1zvGslaDKbH47ZaJOh 6pmohWXH7XyqGuK9gg2VBwfu5nIgOxTugr6juLagRJCgYPrFotGBOoAE/4eCjgFyHwEK aFbKKFfb1l4vGbBHC+YzFgugmg2JL/hla30KnZzw1HlWOgtfPby+Nk4mqHKRK1jJWft9 vNEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:references:mime-version :message-id:in-reply-to:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=8M/syFwNKdzYEjkQkOYzNkXR9VPw1LAYsj1sJNWjiBk=; b=P3y+6NMBJXDl6lSNi+uYzmgjpZaelTd/LSdR8DDSM7HrR/YHYEVxA2dXxs99a2MaNL M9t9koHaxofxNqWPDZ+bF6Kj4Fu9P3hmtC1zEE+mxJUx2+8gG87RrIV8txrYyNV+1B1d uJq+47WcIXB4P2K/WoqZ7AL2uN5D788X2NzdNEZR45gr840zOXHz4FA2D/wHLx/1jQHg YM04f/wF9yH/aQvikMuTyx4FUaQApnZ7JPJVAQMoQwAi0iOB5OZaDQj3yPpgjxBsZG/8 +ms1zSJI0lWmCL5oj0T8+xM1HhUlAXzdQWL1H4uFxygjFEPsmfGRAC0mEnIeGYO6KLN6 jEXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lV4qokZp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g22si4080430edw.133.2021.02.04.14.57.44; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lV4qokZp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229986AbhBDWzj (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:55:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50524 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229969AbhBDWzh (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:55:37 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f4a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9E7C06178B for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:54:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com with SMTP id dh16so3454512qvb.11 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:54:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject :from:to:cc; bh=8M/syFwNKdzYEjkQkOYzNkXR9VPw1LAYsj1sJNWjiBk=; b=lV4qokZpvz9TBE6gXOr2d5HkvXq7zGHt4OIXu6Ce4kM0s8A9g8yBbQ8ElirRcUxRgl dP6GWRVMbDFNGbMM0irGa8mJvWqwhbgj30dkDJIGUYZp3c4ci+bDwzpePFC1rmanj4I0 S3Nv0VOlruxlNlPXN/n6nEmneE6nna28QDkqYv5QYb/zdd/8crkW4r7rvEdR6sAFzPbY ZbEBKffeGdCwf29Q5zz9+we+4cvjNR3NOCl+gv6Ht5twvWTH0KykM04HLrstHOPAxN+I FAgeoJ8cZuyIBFx2QQEAPHx+du9ycRiq4j6Fw2spRW/1aNpWaH3z4OT7OvshwzRXWiHX kyCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=8M/syFwNKdzYEjkQkOYzNkXR9VPw1LAYsj1sJNWjiBk=; b=gkt/Xvj8ktFaKcfLo9uaYvMzfVQpom9ocFPehNwV7k/YpHjh4Ptp+uoHItZckFNxhf /MMT6AjreqkCG1btruRXPm1y0nut3Kf4YtuEhPdKYgMW6XyUtjThK5WNSCbAkVf5h2/D RlRHn3FnL8e+nd1Uebs9jzfpTRg5XHa+D+8BmD9L//V/lLEhV2IAna9qZ03clLoUbMnw r7WlIO5sqqF6LxcmF3i9Lds0opPGjrhj4FwxmHNNdkueLxoTsreVTUGs77d9lBAr8tT0 gdYKfJK8hPE3nXNK02mX5lHBulRaI+82fn18y3AwU8o6xlaV2zTj4l5O1c+bVyZnOqLT qwcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531slPCiZ16U2oKNJxf+xuyplVfbYprYe8zI9iUcXgrEgcIDRLJT Hlca5E38vFYWtig77WGqm8tmZrD57ozx9Q== Sender: "dlatypov via sendgmr" X-Received: from dlatypov.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:2cd:202:bd7a:7717:5b5b:de27]) (user=dlatypov job=sendgmr) by 2002:a0c:b9a2:: with SMTP id v34mr1791579qvf.17.1612479296534; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:54:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:54:46 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20210204225448.1393741-1-dlatypov@google.com> Message-Id: <20210204225448.1393741-2-dlatypov@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20210204225448.1393741-1-dlatypov@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites From: Daniel Latypov To: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, Daniel Latypov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=. E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins --- lib/kunit/Kconfig | 1 + lib/kunit/executor.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/Kconfig b/lib/kunit/Kconfig index 00909e6a2443..0b5dfb001bac 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/Kconfig +++ b/lib/kunit/Kconfig @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ menuconfig KUNIT tristate "KUnit - Enable support for unit tests" + select GLOB if KUNIT=y help Enables support for kernel unit tests (KUnit), a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. These tests are diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index a95742a4ece7..15832ed44668 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 #include +#include +#include /* * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in @@ -11,14 +13,81 @@ extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[]; #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) -static void kunit_print_tap_header(void) +static char *filter_glob; +module_param(filter_glob, charp, 0); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter_glob, + "Filter which KUnit test suites run at boot-time, e.g. list*"); + +static struct kunit_suite * const * +kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite) +{ + int i, n = 0; + struct kunit_suite **filtered; + + n = 0; + for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) { + if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name)) + ++n; + } + + if (n == 0) + return NULL; + + filtered = kmalloc_array(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!filtered) + return NULL; + + n = 0; + for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) { + if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name)) + filtered[n++] = subsuite[i]; + } + filtered[n] = NULL; + + return filtered; +} + +struct suite_set { + struct kunit_suite * const * const *start; + struct kunit_suite * const * const *end; +}; + +static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(void) +{ + int i; + struct kunit_suite * const **copy, * const *filtered_subsuite; + struct suite_set filtered; + + const size_t max = __kunit_suites_end - __kunit_suites_start; + + if (!filter_glob) { + filtered.start = __kunit_suites_start; + filtered.end = __kunit_suites_end; + return filtered; + } + + copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL); + filtered.start = copy; + if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */ + filtered.end = copy; + return filtered; + } + + for (i = 0; i < max; ++i) { + filtered_subsuite = kunit_filter_subsuite(__kunit_suites_start[i]); + if (filtered_subsuite) + *copy++ = filtered_subsuite; + } + filtered.end = copy; + return filtered; +} + +static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set) { struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite; int num_of_suites = 0; - for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; - suites < __kunit_suites_end; - suites++) + for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++) num_of_suites++; @@ -30,12 +99,18 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void) { struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites; - kunit_print_tap_header(); + struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(); + + kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set); + + for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) + __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites); - for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; - suites < __kunit_suites_end; - suites++) - __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites); + if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */ + for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) + kfree(*suites); + kfree(suite_set.start); + } return 0; } -- 2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog