Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1559037pxb; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:47:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyj0YH25WAKBYyiQMza29+pI04YsXi375kuuV6x0hJxIWjsUdXe1N/g3xOSlHO8jlWMCUKc X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:310a:: with SMTP id dc10mr1196941edb.258.1612486071593; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 16:47:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612486071; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iCAkRpcLiOHG3b4Tg5ocqely7MLlPQszb5qnPWMXFI4dApC3eDk1SsYtXgi8Bpsp1D fb/EIbVfAfywYW2XZ9iwbqKTGJKbEZvJ4jBW7t/4fcfadN+7JFo1xPJK49yz3iVH1QMV e6JZxoMJ6Q/CC7bmdkRA5y3GvuVs8PeNwMAutxHqWcsRBwB4iojGpMwOcG8r/SiU7kQx Q7XTjFqOS4y7yiTjd9MHs+UFlJrh2kdRnTDp4iExzOAMs0NVxwjokiwFiaaayIelx5+R Jb8E7S5Vfrvp8AO0WeF5V0rn8YDxI+8TudX+K2rwPZjvDOpdEBty4i2wI8EsmsJlsdlN p9yg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=8l4LBetL4FwKtEajAnPJayco0WfIz8p8VPvenip5++I=; b=lESCiyR7Tay8AXi6jzqclL4iM972hDqj3xCsWkJEWG/ESmHgTzdqWkezitL4moAJWw HgpwIbn8MYnwqyMeZ6i/Lg/A5fcFs8XLqLotxurLCdqtTR7HGlL3EAavUqAHvN6kbIuV YrQZVTPhUlyXvh/iaIq+QdW5DppUzXH0uFS3NzYNgWjR0YEuoekArb8nY+Qx4Dk4gzBL ZTlggxG8cRExvrLLauKKS01/HB+6M6wGm1kChvCFkJqn/E7DgarmDhOTKbntbcMaGHOX mZGYmBEN63IviE8rSQT6jIdSo40TT4s75pYwJDL1jR5X9uS6IVnO4sMNNa9PlmoqWWEK SGhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=WcRZnvio; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v8si4061397edc.382.2021.02.04.16.47.26; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 16:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=WcRZnvio; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237340AbhBDPaj (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:30:39 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53968 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237325AbhBDP3k (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:29:40 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CEEE64DF5; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:28:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1612452539; bh=I6xC+Xl7rj9KjJh8OT+FRp7sxPgM1E+61VHhivEMUsU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WcRZnvioNG7VFrSgWK+Z0q9blvJWKlVZ/fNFQTAkkNlXRbtu4XZ8YY6wTdroBK/q+ buNdv8g6BFDyuzSm6z/vgjSGHhnA39A3zw6/geD5Ho+lkj03jRecRw9hCzWKz7TnPf L6QV8t86Vh+YIHEdlCZDx3Wnz3FaRCdaxFpEwBF8= Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:28:56 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Kent Gibson , Linus Walleij , linux-gpio , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: uapi: use the preferred SPDX license identifier Message-ID: References: <20210204124357.3817-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:35 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:15:50PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 2:47 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:43:57PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > > > > > > > GPL-2.0 license identifier is deprecated, let's use the preferred > > > > > identifier: GPL-2.0-only. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > > --- > > > > > Hi Kent, Greg, > > > > > > > > > > I started working on making libgpiod licensing reuse-compliant and noticed > > > > > that the reuse-tool is telling me that the GPL-2.0 SPDX identifier in the > > > > > GPIO uapi header is deprecated. Since I'm required to copy the header > > > > > verbatim into libgpiod's repository, I think we need to fix that at source > > > > > first. > > > > > > > > > > include/uapi/linux/gpio.h | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > > index e4eb0b8c5cf9..3e01ededbf36 100644 > > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > > > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */ > > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note */ > > > > > > > > No, there is no need to convert the kernel to the "latest" spdx level, > > > > when we started out there was no "-only" nonsense (hint no other license > > > > has that crud), and "GPL-2.0" is a totally valid summary of the license. > > > > > > > > So please don't go changing it all in-kernel, that way lies madness. > > > > Let's finish fixing up ALL kernel files before worrying about what SPDX > > > > "version" we are at. > > > > > > > > > > But then, the reuse script is telling me: > > > > > > Unfortunately, your project is not compliant with version 3.0 of > > > the REUSE Specification :-( > > > > > > because I'm using a deprecated license. :( > > > > Go yell at the REUSE people, there's no requirement to have the most > > recent version of SPDX, is there? :) > > > > And if that's the only thing wrong with the project when running 'reuse > > lint' then you should be happy, no one will complain at all. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Ok, I get it but let me try one last time: there's absolutely no harm > in merging this patch for the next release, is there? Currently there > are around 15000 instances of "GPL-2.0-only" in the kernel vs 30000 > "GPL-2.0" - so the former is not that uncommon. It's up to the owner/maintainer of this file in the end, but I don't want to see patches doing this for many more files, as it's pointless churn as far as the kernel is concerned. thanks, greg k-h