Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750735AbWIUKYb (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:24:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750756AbWIUKYb (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:24:31 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:28385 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750735AbWIUKYa (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:24:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:24:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: john stultz cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans (NTP changes) In-Reply-To: <1158805731.8648.54.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <20060920135438.d7dd362b.akpm@osdl.org> <1158805731.8648.54.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 912 Lines: 22 Hi, On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, john stultz wrote: > No objections here, but I wanted to put forth some caution as I've seen > some odd NTP behavior with the full NTP patchset on my laptop (either it > does not converge or it just converges *much* more slowly then without). > Unfortunately I've not been able to collect solid enough data to analyze > the issue (really, each run should go for atleast a full day and always > run on the same network). grumble... As I said before it's expected that the initial covergence is slower and I need the data over multiple days to really say something about it. There has been really a lot of time for doing this... bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/