Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1724812pxb; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:57:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbbsDWOadVlbIYtygcY5PpUTIcBrkPPfKXtu4AOOQp+JrocfSHh4iNEycVg09ZjKSwth9o X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3069:: with SMTP id bs9mr800423edb.151.1612508248997; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 22:57:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612508248; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k4tBX9KzlKhmbBfHLqppRwzjE1hnq2j8n40yEXN48vDuEIFAzMxc3dQR7q1o3cOnxw A1ZBtLFFDqlHRU7FiR8vHFAUzWHpPYhZ92mNeEV5uchbSU5ENAQ5xjLBuuw1E0yQl6H9 t2HNo3mSr8ipje4xFPYi2ukBvscLSm5FRQ79sfTOYk1dUCpvVmjPz3+eMx/93y5M2Sv1 a7KbgGeWogmsOVTkZXi6SRc0WG/YOcjr7fdWfEzRqjfBTTM4sAxxViLSdzAZtCC51FuJ zJhO5F0NCnqMnM0n0l/iDFDUY8OfilKJFYMAHww/m4qeE8g4774scf7r2+KN99Bq+y7u /HUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=cpdqHFAP/ZgCSsQGHyNAf+SemKKm+IyMVPQ2A6yHkbk=; b=H1BvlYaQS1E/BPZcyXzNicedQxAqiv7IyGNMkVm9XaPqfVSwaUEl8wrTIC7aMtCsTc R/wynAeYuSszLLa0LfPszlIM891Vm8o4I85TbRkBJ/6KZcjGLgHzcUDM881wUhZWSj1G tA9pxUjSf9nfrhZduJXh4gBJxQ3DpYLzqpnJVVazL+89Hlc4bXj4Xibi2/KctzF2/twd pzc9DIM3/A93IqXvKnVlbVu+3sCkIEqB267aulMVyU/9n8965QCek3UVV9oUPBILMroF BAnJ4H1XfcKCr4l3M5X3jW7/bF2VSODpDuqwoAUnZ5HtFfVZKWhmrC8VF8qOmAaampMs Li1w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=EErDkAVC; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=mEkbWSol; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bx17si4474058edb.578.2021.02.04.22.57.03; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 22:57:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=EErDkAVC; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=mEkbWSol; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230525AbhBEGzw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:55:52 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:41473 "EHLO wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230415AbhBEGzp (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:55:45 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A7F4E0; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:54:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 01:54:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=cpdqHFAP/ZgCSsQGHyNAf+SemKK m+IyMVPQ2A6yHkbk=; b=EErDkAVCLuZqZ/qCluF3af0UxCkTF5hH+hMzODbPuQB qVsrcwJt6X3eUjezWZijSNUSGUfdSk/RHn8laCJDbO9gt48Z6IbLV7IzwH9W++wY K94YcTwhcobKjlYoG1OiWad9+ic+zmLKcrwIIcB0tiXz5lnmfCZXMAk6Yi8MKfWU 6kI45VjScrKH+sVizKsVKLHereoOT1NcxnSqwLnCZyOe6uQ9JcZs1iU0EY1yuzQP POCBp4OcyETb9q/F34Wo8IygTylVdNjJDHeX48uVyBriv0nMV3zb1hxlcLOwFKj3 FubdGFVj2B7q7vNP84UTtm1Qk13Ss4Z8n1+WHWyQmlw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=cpdqHF AP/ZgCSsQGHyNAf+SemKKm+IyMVPQ2A6yHkbk=; b=mEkbWSolboWDaYEf8UvyoN SU2BTWTCk0Pyx4KRgk2c6XIUCaOckqpWBp8e7/HjYjyOjT8RXK7nxU8HU+GtCikC QoainnswER4Zcp3R3QJznTGrnH8X0B6RP2WxhYY3qy6UFRiz7ahrOTyCLuz+15uC NOeB10YvrQzlVz6D8xe1meGxQMx6Cxjc9LetQgEnoogdPgSBU1bkz9EUVTaNAc/Y QNM8ZTcSn7L3WvnciY289fLWBa2ZZGlNNjHAD9qDlNwFMlUyDa0YDqGrNmOa63Q9 K/c0XlM9Glne5ghau58hyC8sThw/Rd3WMQFxOr15s2sSEheQFfY/eU9XJNGPFQwg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeehgddutddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcu mffjuceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevueehje fgfffgiedvudekvdektdelleelgefhleejieeugeegveeuuddukedvteenucfkphepkeef rdekiedrjeegrdeigeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D852524005B; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:54:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:54:55 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Rapoport , Chris Wilson , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5 Message-ID: References: <161160687463.28991.354987542182281928@build.alporthouse.com> <20210204181925.GL299309@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:32:56AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:19 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit > > > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")? > > > > Unfortunately, I was too optimistic and didn't take into account that this > > commit changes the way /dev/mem sees the first page of memory. > > > > There were reports of slackware users about issues with lilo after upgrade > > from 5.10.11 to 5.10.12 > > Ok, applied to mainline. > > Greg & stable people - this is now commit 5c279c4cf206 ("Revert > "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0"") in my tree. > Although maybe you just want to revert the commit in stable, rather > than take it from upstream? Same difference. Taking it from upstream makes it easier to track over time what happend. I've queued it up now, thanks! greg k-h