Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210204184519.2809313-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <YBys6Io1ZbZdzWmj@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <YBys6Io1ZbZdzWmj@kernel.org>
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:43:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uFM=ZW_+D32OGfirwY83ZkUKQpiA-3zGx9KAe1UKjW0XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Drop racy follow_pfn check
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:26 AM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:45:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > References: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20201127164131.2244124-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch/
>
> What is the difference between this and "Link:" anyway?

Afaik References: is for other reading (bug reports, discussions,
other patch series), Link: is for patch submission itself (which I
think some subsystem do an entire chain of, on each revision). My
scripts aren't good enough that they add the Link: before submitting,
I add them when I apply patches (since most patches I get don't have
them anyway).

btw since the final patch to remove follow_pfn won't be ready for 5.12
merge window (kvm and vfio have some work to do) I think it's best if
you just queue this up in your tree?

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch