Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-Id: <ad782af87a222efc79cfb06079b0fd23d4224eaf.1612515180.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/8xx: Fix software emulation interrupt
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, npiggin@gmail.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Date:   Fri,  5 Feb 2021 08:56:13 +0000 (UTC)
Precedence: bulk

For unimplemented instructions or unimplemented SPRs, the 8xx triggers
a "Software Emulation Exception" (0x1000). That interrupt doesn't set
reason bits in SRR1 as the "Program Check Exception" does.

Go through emulation_assist_interrupt() to set REASON_ILLEGAL.

Fixes: fbbcc3bb139e ("powerpc/8xx: Remove SoftwareEmulation()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
I'm wondering whether it wouldn't be better to set REASON_ILLEGAL
in the exception prolog and still call program_check_exception.
And do the same in book3s/64 to avoid the nightmare of an
INTERRUPT_HANDLER calling another INTERRUPT_HANDLER.
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 52702f3db6df..9eb63cf6ac38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ SystemCall:
 /* On the MPC8xx, this is a software emulation interrupt.  It occurs
  * for all unimplemented and illegal instructions.
  */
-	EXCEPTION(0x1000, SoftEmu, program_check_exception, EXC_XFER_STD)
+	EXCEPTION(0x1000, SoftEmu, emulation_assist_interrupt, EXC_XFER_STD)
 
 	. = 0x1100
 /*
-- 
2.25.0