Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: mmc_test: use erase_arg for mmc_erase command
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
CC:     <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        <ludovic.barre@foss.st.com>, <per.forlin@linaro.org>,
        <huyue2@yulong.com>, <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        <vbadigan@codeaurora.org>, <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        <marex@denx.de>, <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20210204120547.15381-1-yann.gautier@foss.st.com>
 <20210204120547.15381-3-yann.gautier@foss.st.com>
 <c1531549-29da-25dc-cada-f61edbc5f2fd@intel.com>
From:   Yann GAUTIER <yann.gautier@foss.st.com>
Message-ID: <b527e4ac-a5c7-c684-7a55-0c5510948805@foss.st.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:05:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c1531549-29da-25dc-cada-f61edbc5f2fd@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2/5/21 7:33 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 4/02/21 2:05 pm, yann.gautier@foss.st.com wrote:
>> From: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com>
>>
>> Since [1], the erase argument for mmc_erase() function is saved in
>> erase_arg field of card structure. It is preferable to use it instead of
>> hard-coded MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG, which from eMMC 4.51 spec is not
>> recommended:
>> "6.6.16 Secure Erase
>> NOTE Secure Erase is included for backwards compatibility. New system
>> level implementations (based on v4.51 devices and beyond) should use
>> Erase combined with Sanitize instead of secure erase."
>>
>>   [1] commit 01904ff77676 ("mmc: core: Calculate the discard arg only once")
>>
> 
> Did you experience an issue because of this?  You could add that to the
> commit message.

Hi Adrian,

Thanks for the review!
Yes, I've seen an issue on STM32MP157C-EV1 board.
After a write test (e.g. test 36), the tests 37 or 38, using mmc_erase 
fail. With the erase argument used by default in the framework 
(MMC_DISCARD_ARG), I can no more see this.

I can send a new version of the series with comment update here, and a 
fixup on the first patch.


Regards,
Yann

> 
> There does not seem to be a need for secure erase, so:
> 
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> 
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
>> index 39a478874ca3..63524551a13a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
>> @@ -2110,7 +2110,7 @@ static int mmc_test_rw_multiple(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>>   	if (mmc_can_erase(test->card) &&
>>   	    tdata->prepare & MMC_TEST_PREP_ERASE) {
>>   		ret = mmc_erase(test->card, dev_addr,
>> -				size / 512, MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG);
>> +				size / 512, test->card->erase_arg);
>>   		if (ret)
>>   			ret = mmc_erase(test->card, dev_addr,
>>   					size / 512, MMC_ERASE_ARG);
>>
>