Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751305AbWIUQZv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:25:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751309AbWIUQZv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:25:51 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([217.147.92.249]:25866 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751305AbWIUQZv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:25:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:25:44 +0100 From: Russell King To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Martin Michlmayr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: AUDIT=y build failure on ARM Message-ID: <20060921162543.GA29714@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Martin Michlmayr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk References: <20060920124908.GA30389@deprecation.cyrius.com> <200609211144.k8LBiGjY018080@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609211144.k8LBiGjY018080@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1558 Lines: 32 On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:44:16AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:49:08 +0200, Martin Michlmayr said: > > I get the build failure below with AUDIT=y on ARM. The problem is > > that lib/audit.c includes asm-generic/audit_dir_write.h which lists a > > number of syscalls that are not defined on ARM (and some other platforms). > > And somebody (I forget who) was complaining that some debugging tool was only available > on the x86/sparc/ppc families of CPUs, and didn't like Alan Cox's suggestion > that they go add it. > > Given that missing an entire class of syscall (the *at flavors) on an > architecture isn't a deterrent to inclusion, Alan's response was totally > on-target.... > > (I'm presuming the usual reason for such missing syscalls is that nobody > has bothered trying to run software that uses a *at call on an ARM, so > nobody's bothered wiring them up and thereby increasing the kernel image > size on a platform where it's likely to be *very* important?) They probably should be wired up, but TBH I _always_ miss the addition of such things. I don't remember there being any notification to arch maintainers that something was due to be done. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/