Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751479AbWIUTZj (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:25:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751445AbWIUTZj (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:25:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54411 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751481AbWIUTZi (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:25:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:24:27 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Andrew Morton , Anton Altaparmakov , Jonathan Woithe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fw: 2.6.17 oops, possibly ntfs/mmap related Message-ID: <20060921192427.GD17065@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Anton Altaparmakov , Jonathan Woithe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060912205602.57568b2a.akpm@osdl.org> <1158832483.5958.7.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <1158849696.5958.39.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20060921105236.76e344a2.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1489 Lines: 35 On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:04:49PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0010c744 > printing eip: > c013be50 > *pde = 00000000 > Oops: 0002 [#1] > Modules linked in: ntfs 8139too via_agp agpgart usb_storage ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore > CPU: 0 > EIP: 0060:[] Tainted: G M VLI > EFLAGS: 00010282 (2.6.17 #2) > EIP is at anon_vma_unlink+0x16/0x3c > eax: 0010c740 ebx: cf1070cc ecx: cf107104 edx: cf8bc740 > esi: cf8bc740 edi: b7e82000 ebp: 00000000 esp: cdad7f58 > > I haven't worked out the disassembly in detail to support the idea > (though certainly anon_vma_unlink would be trying to list_del around > here), but that eax and esi do suggest a corrupted list: somehow the > top half of a pointer overwritten by the top half of LIST_POISON1. > > And in Anton's case, the top half of a pointer overwritten by the > bottom half of LIST_POISON2. > > Maybe just coincidence, and I've nothing more illuminating to add; > but just a hint of a list_del going very wrong somewhere? Given a machine check happened, the state of the machine in general is questionable. I'd recommend a run of memtest86+ Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/