Received: by 2002:a05:6520:2f93:b029:af:d4db:7a05 with SMTP id 19csp2381950lkf; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:40:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNQAZhPfMfFeFuHGQX1ZodHdiCq2GEpmWsMzyvifxb+rMPMuPFoRW3Ulr8GN1uMdO6ih1r X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4a19:: with SMTP id w25mr5492458eju.153.1612554036971; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:40:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612554036; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nAuznFi/zRctj9dBCqkqaIEhF0KOzlV6qiKZxE1crFUqgKkp6FSZRlwsbMf2kvtxCX q7a31t0vArDI+KtHh+2T55FJN0Jth2rRSAaAH1jYV1H6N42YP/WQbhrEAdgMDanaDQqc jbympfPYo2x8AQslOCXLueK7290KoIcEcygg0RQCWvLnoR/1QRyaxXIJ1mcztG9dFig4 b0aZEA8Ujh04M4aYY+z1TPczaISQqvZOARDWg3k+xS/k459VIAW393TuVjPMotLyd+W2 dpnyd+pQPer/PmhhrUBtvPGpAwsFoa+psPDCJDHdZmacjQ30WSlqe4/zJ6RMfxIChGf6 Gphg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=eUmZrbKHjj0yMZIv7s4Zcux/4ghEhjzea5dl+8fwcEg=; b=LA6XX4+3pfHDFukgAcSJdjElBgY0Boycuvl4gXqbz+F7ZqjcpVGABRrGBPcbkbztc+ aVj2k5aviQLFb9f0XnFclm57vyGOq7li4mQixSda9irk/GTlMTRGxTprWHQFmiXQoz4a cMIFYrag707pr5Mdm7kTVZ1rVDxDAj4RH/zT402JeDQ9m59Qnv135VtqFDZBKqx0pu2+ z+enc8Q1phme2bK2F+jUT2PwyDqbXDyod68/YU8AOWa3RFBsq6UD8K0NA8N6MUEUIELv r1YVzMXGj2tu+ycVtlRTB0c9uhbxMMZYSPgU+NvBAlLLTaiglRCEXYffCpg0/k3OAURC +s3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bz20si5864110ejc.459.2021.02.05.11.40.12; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233376AbhBERyp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:54:45 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:36974 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233285AbhBEP3r (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:29:47 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA6311B3; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:00:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C5333F718; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:00:00 -0800 (PST) From: Valentin Schneider To: Vincent Guittot Cc: linux-kernel , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Qais Yousef , Quentin Perret , Pavan Kondeti , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] sched/fair: Tweak misfit-related capacity checks In-Reply-To: References: <20210128183141.28097-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210128183141.28097-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:59:55 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/02/21 15:31, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 19:32, Valentin Schneider > wrote: >> >> During load-balance, groups classified as group_misfit_task are filtered >> out if they do not pass >> >> group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(, ); > > group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity and group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity are > removed in the next patch. Merge this and the next and directly remove > them > OK. >> @@ -8253,7 +8260,7 @@ check_cpu_capacity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd) >> static inline int check_misfit_status(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd) >> { >> return rq->misfit_task_load && >> - (rq->cpu_capacity_orig < rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity || >> + (capacity_greater(rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity, rq->cpu_capacity_orig) || > > Why do you add a margin here whereas there was no margin before ? > Comparing capacities without any sort of filter can lead to ping-ponging tasks around (capacity values very easily fluctuate by +/- 1, if not more). I'm guilty of doing two things at once here: replace existing users, and convert callsites that should be existing users. I can split the conversion in a separate patch.