Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210205045217.552927-1-enbyamy@gmail.com> <20210205131910.GJ1993@twin.jikos.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20210205131910.GJ1993@twin.jikos.cz>
From:   Amy Parker <enbyamy@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:36:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CAE1WUT4az3ZZ8OU2AS2xxi9h1TbW958ivNXr53jinqHK5vuzMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide
To:     dsterba@suse.cz, Amy Parker <enbyamy@gmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:1 AM David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:52:14PM -0800, Amy Parker wrote:
> > As the EFS driver is old and non-maintained,
>
> Is anybody using EFS on current kernels? There's not much point updating
> it to current coding style, deleting fs/efs is probably the best option.
>

Wouldn't be surprised if there's a few systems out there that haven't
migrated at all.

> The EFS name is common for several filesystems, not to be confused with
> eg.  Encrypted File System. In linux it's the IRIX version, check
> Kconfig, and you could hardly find the utilities to create such
> filesystem.

Ah yep, good point.

   -Amy IP