Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210205045217.552927-1-enbyamy@gmail.com> <20210205131910.GJ1993@twin.jikos.cz>
 <CAE1WUT4az3ZZ8OU2AS2xxi9h1TbW958ivNXr53jinqHK5vuzMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLxGvz0ZnTs1B7v3R+Zefd5BhE9ximFpgKL8zRmGfOdBrsVfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFLxGvz0ZnTs1B7v3R+Zefd5BhE9ximFpgKL8zRmGfOdBrsVfw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Amy Parker <enbyamy@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:49:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CAE1WUT6Hq=phyjW1Wv01nvG1fWOAZVEsNyrtKC6Tu37ABnU=dA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc:     dsterba@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:37 PM Richard Weinberger
<richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:26 PM Amy Parker <enbyamy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:1 AM David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:52:14PM -0800, Amy Parker wrote:
> > > > As the EFS driver is old and non-maintained,
> > >
> > > Is anybody using EFS on current kernels? There's not much point updating
> > > it to current coding style, deleting fs/efs is probably the best option.
> > >
> >
> > Wouldn't be surprised if there's a few systems out there that haven't
> > migrated at all.
>
> Before ripping it from the kernel source you could do a FUSE port of EFS.
> That way old filesystems can still get used on Linux.

A FUSE port of EFS would be a great idea. Know anyone that would be
interested in working on it? I might try picking it up if no one else
wants it, we'll see.