Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2451645pxb; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:44:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZxXFMY+RypQnzhif5CAvFF3fGCapD0AEub9KEmkwBH8rEVuCmh98hybKm3KGI5fexSxE5 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cd45:: with SMTP id v5mr4637398edw.373.1612583054929; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:44:14 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612583054; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SBUoaOaIkPmjDebnfoiPwOBLgbeA96jooUtxZa8P2HoCmoNmx7nlHog65Mmx4cWpJO wA0s9SuIVmO6PrpZG509V2ka82ZtGpb9roijrjbd7Cgpz7UR2dX7Mhm2EMug1eslFmco RPfwMUNThkiOyz5YlNTFVm6fJaqm9kX0R6fl8jC+gQ0wMCelVdnWAu8oS2VTV01GRJup NgbaLUZVJygXmcprT7xsjPLa2Fsg0WP1sJ0kpkgnYyMMMSwRTP+BhtLeFeHuuP3gEstY ABnET0t8tmqm2OSa1Gb4GGKou1a7s+0aBMnjAD9AesHAdZ8aaNwEEWi8CKVwTm0ltS9g cu3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=0CThZisk8ypQGjJO6x1LhHL7Xhm/PdgdSDv39h3UwsE=; b=ZLv9IWrqU4W1QjF5keu+WvPWyBxdm6UZYZRqsZ8UblvstNkC/SzTPgXhIZmxE52nhi n0Lor5L4LLiWouwZxO2yM27oxJLZReiBBPc0E0Ym7is6hZuNRKfXwjh3x4zhnupk8iRV hS0YreM5EPT5TXb6Ns5rgUArU3WpfNSCDzcauEWcOf2KhrRAxdcGwBEo0uhLmKZ5t0f7 /nDcrFMIwli9Y+4xfp8PZlIU7JuXYgnS8ad9qpiuhQiRxneyEXTxk3fq8AyLSsjx3/Rs Vmmhb/kAsrpvucNjnkB78X7uV9XIurvJD3dDdJhY2YR4q4kfhh7n3ahYrBfLvTVpHbMc pIKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="kfZf/3+w"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cw10si6888256ejb.36.2021.02.05.19.43.50; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:44:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="kfZf/3+w"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230000AbhBFDkb (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 22:40:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37194 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230039AbhBFCcN (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:32:13 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932FBC0698D2 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:28:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id a16so4282517plh.8 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:28:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version; bh=0CThZisk8ypQGjJO6x1LhHL7Xhm/PdgdSDv39h3UwsE=; b=kfZf/3+weJ8zVno0BYKgnjRpYC81thjaKMZAsYaxC+Xv4UfuDcUIKDg0soTXizlRQh ujNDcloW52Kjq3Kt0DK08lZIlPneGikcstO31NRpkGQTzV3HQ93UIAMFy4eLJkW/XOsN rPcr2gIDi/kRqCmMbER9s+G8hqfoj2TLnrepBRsGksMH2yYpj/TQH1r2yWBZTnwjH2Yh FU7nj8sCNYHjlNqYU4NBTdQXtCFN8wVNQ9suoS7Y6FoDd5iyVcGev1uWLaZiM/dqMaYG qTmBr7QvxSwrzyTpli/TD7f2KVO91TJiREN3vatXv+q5NdGdb+vGqxiroZz6PWG0wyIX IvdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:mime-version; bh=0CThZisk8ypQGjJO6x1LhHL7Xhm/PdgdSDv39h3UwsE=; b=iQsKqekv4U4kBE8L4O4pzrfbVYbknq9JQyB0FjuyBy3RFGoCBLXyMCHHDvsXq/MWXC 1yk+My9I7ptQC2nte5Qnor8yPVdEBuUfMIaU9YHca5jABbCcmE0FdUPlAklI833+1elI OlPlZIY51E/8AYMkizK0HnSGfPWuh0XgTOTSw99Hl63xCWBAnxNBJCGH9p3MVYsA0eGS wb4gqImdsyFriGhueh036qTLC1oiX9o1svE3Vp/DXLCPkCFrdl6Mp4nRLejBhsvebE46 zrCZGl/XgRpMj+N0PPWXYIgAoEuh80IYXtmgxA9m6vwE8WE7Hw584NgaSnfi3hrBpegt K1Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UG7fzH+D/8ohpaRCeHJlKhHAdUCRwdHijNpH6T+NYIDGfacfW qx4d/9DpT3Qc2HEEVp+5F7IkTXirVFbAug== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b411:b029:e0:8f0:5ba with SMTP id x17-20020a170902b411b02900e008f005bamr6124016plr.19.1612564089949; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:28:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2620:15c:17:3:71b0:f7a6:59ec:6ab3] ([2620:15c:17:3:71b0:f7a6:59ec:6ab3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s21sm11115691pga.12.2021.02.05.14.28.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:28:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:28:08 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes To: Charan Teja Kalla cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@suse.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: update the COMPACT[STALL|FAIL] events properly In-Reply-To: <160ba3b5-2cd4-5ff0-1348-fb477cefd33d@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <1213f4c6-7557-268d-253e-23f8fea55b19@google.com> References: <1612187338-19100-1-git-send-email-charante@codeaurora.org> <160ba3b5-2cd4-5ff0-1348-fb477cefd33d@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Feb 2021, Charan Teja Kalla wrote: > >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > >> index 519a60d..531f244 100644 > >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > >> @@ -4152,6 +4152,8 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, > >> memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag); > >> psi_memstall_leave(&pflags); > >> > >> + if (*compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED) > >> + return NULL; > >> /* > >> * At least in one zone compaction wasn't deferred or skipped, so let's > >> * count a compaction stall > > > > This makes sense, I wonder if it would also be useful to check that > > page == NULL, either in try_to_compact_pages() or here for > > COMPACT_SKIPPED? > > In the code, when COMPACT_SKIPPED is being returned, the page will > always be NULL. So, I'm not sure how much useful it is for the page == > NULL check here. Or I failed to understand your point here? > Your code is short-circuiting the rest of __alloc_pages_direct_compact() where the return value is dictated by whether page is NULL or non-NULL. We can't leak a captured page if we are testing for it being NULL or non-NULL, which is what the rest of __alloc_pages_direct_compact() does *before* your change. So the idea was to add a check the page is actually NULL here since you are now relying on the return value of compact_zone_order() to be COMPACT_SKIPPED to infer page == NULL. I agree that's currently true in the code, I was trying to catch any errors where current->capture_control.page was non-NULL but try_to_compact_pages() returns COMPACT_SKIPPED. There's some complexity here. So my idea was the expand this out to: if (*compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED) { VM_BUG_ON(page); return NULL; }